I see an opportunity for a fight with mikeh:
Double followed by 4D is logically forcing!
I may have to explain the logic to my partner though.
Another Your turn topic
#21
Posted 2011-July-19, 17:31
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#22
Posted 2011-July-19, 18:07
han, on 2011-July-19, 17:31, said:
I see an opportunity for a fight with mikeh:
Double followed by 4D is logically forcing!
I may have to explain the logic to my partner though.
Double followed by 4D is logically forcing!
I may have to explain the logic to my partner though.
If I stay unlurked, it will be because I don't fight anymore. I may debate. I may even argue, but I won't fight....if I do...I'll be gone again. I really didn't like reading some of my old posts, and hope to never get back to that way of posting again:)
And of course, I haven't actually expressed an opinion on whether double then 4♦ should, could, or shouldn't be forcing. I simply don't know, which is why I selected a different start rather than run the (forseeable) risk of having to guess how partner would read it. Life has taught me that if I don't know what I mean (whether bidding or in real life) the odds are that partner won't know what I mean either:)
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#23
Posted 2011-July-20, 00:31
I think you should stay unlurked.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn