BBO Discussion Forums: Basic question on attitude signals - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Basic question on attitude signals

#1 User is offline   plaur 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 313
  • Joined: 2005-April-03

Posted 2011-July-06, 01:26



MP's. You sit North and deals and opens 1NT. Partner doubles 2 and leads 8
Your agreements are that you now make an attitude signal (upside down)
Do you play the 7, to say "I dont like diamonds, please shift"
or do you play the 2, to say "yes I have the queen"?

(you do not play Smith echo or other advanced agreements)

And more in the general:
Do you use attitude to tell partner your holding in that suit or to ask partner to continue the suit or shift to another?
0

#2 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,084
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scottish Borders

Posted 2011-July-06, 02:42

I'm not sure this is a 'basic' question (I guess the number of different replies will tell), but I do think it is an important one that is worth asking!

On this specific hand, I would play a discouraging diamond because I want to tell partner that I would be very pleased to see a club shift. I am hoping, given the auction, that partner holds the ace of hearts and will know that I do not want a switch to that suit. After the club switch I intend to lead the Q to establish our diamond trick as it looks like partner has led from shortage. He can then make the decision whether to ruff diamonds twice, or not, if he has a singleton.

More generally, on most hands I signal attitude based on the holding in the suit. Occasionally I will encourage with a poor holding to prevent partner shifting when this looks very wrong - I think you learn with experience when this applies, but I will say it is always far more obvious to the signaller than his partner so try not to blame partner when it does not work!

Some (expert) players play a carding system known as Obvious Shift (http://www.bridgeguy..._principle.html) - their focus is definitely on getting partner to shift or not, rather than the holding in the suit. It is worth looking at these methods even if you do not adopt them as it would help your signalling thought process.
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#3 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2011-July-06, 04:04

I am relatively certain that this particular diamolnd position falls into the category of "Your card should be suit preference regardless of your holding". Certainly, if you had opened one diamond it would be.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

#4 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-July-06, 08:38

I am curious what hand partner holds that passes 1NT, but doubles 2. Assuming that east has bid his longest suit in response to west's double, then south holds at most three spades, and at most 7 points (maybe a bad 8). Why did he think he was beating 2? Are you sure his double was for business?

Anyway, on the actual question, I play the 7, hoping partner finds the right shift ... if he gets in. Our diamond trick isn't going anywhere. Phil has a point about suit preference, but this requires a lot of confidence in your signaling, you need to be very sure partner would understand this.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   plaur 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 313
  • Joined: 2005-April-03

Posted 2011-July-07, 09:59

View Postbillw55, on 2011-July-06, 08:38, said:

I am curious what hand partner holds that passes 1NT, but doubles 2. Assuming that east has bid his longest suit in response to west's double, then south holds at most three spades, and at most 7 points (maybe a bad 8). Why did he think he was beating 2? Are you sure his double was for business?


It was matchpointed pairs. With 7 HCP I like to have a penalty x avail. We just cant let them play 2 spades undoubled in this auction, when we may have 90/120. Imps is a different story.
0

#6 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-July-07, 10:56

View Postplaur, on 2011-July-07, 09:59, said:

It was matchpointed pairs. With 7 HCP I like to have a penalty x avail. We just cant let them play 2 spades undoubled in this auction, when we may have 90/120. Imps is a different story.

Ah I see now, matchpoints, I overlooked that before. Yes, I have found that -110 tends to be a pretty bad score anyway, so might as well do something.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#7 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2011-July-07, 12:12

View Postplaur, on 2011-July-06, 01:26, said:

MP's. You sit North and deals and opens 1NT. Partner doubles 2 and leads 8
Your agreements are that you now make an attitude signal (upside down)
Do you play the 7, to say "I dont like diamonds, please shift"
or do you play the 2, to say "yes I have the queen"?

(you do not play Smith echo or other advanced agreements)

And more in the general:
Do you use attitude to tell partner your holding in that suit or to ask partner to continue the suit or shift to another?


Paulg suggest that this is not a basic question, but in my opinion it is. You stated clearly that YOUR agreement is to give attitude in this situation. That means your choice is to either encourage diamonds (showing the queen) or to discourage diamonds. Playing your agreement, if you discourage in diamonds it carries no other meaning (you can not discourage and say at the same time please lead a club or please lead a heart).

With Kxx in both of those suits, you can sometimes "guess" what suit partner will lead anyway if he did switch. Logically we can make some inference from partners opening lead. Partner had no hcp in clubs (we can see all them) and none in diamonds (we can see all them and he lead the eight). Partner will have some hcp, and those are in the majors. Available cards are KJ, AQ. I think it is reasonable to suggest that partner has both the spade King and heart ACE and at least one more honor. Since we don't think he will lead away from the heart ACE if we discourage we will get a club shift. So playing what you said you play, I would discourage.

Odds are fair your partner holds something like: Kxx AQxx 8x xxxx or KJx Axxx 8x xxxx, he may have a fifth club and one less diamond too. Partner is unlikely to have five hearts since on jacoby.

Now I suggested that playing your methods, you can not convey any other information. Two people have alluded to other options. One is obvious shift, where if you discourage it ask for the obvious shift. For obvious shift to imply a club shift in this situation where your side has not bid a suit, the only suit they bid is trumps, and the two side suits in dummy are equivalent would require quite some detail in your obvious shift agreement,

Another poster (phil_somenumber) has suggested that situation with AKx in dummy is a place where you should have some other agreement that over-rides the normal attitude signal you play and thus your carding should be suit preference (low for clubs, high for hearts). I think this is outside what you said you played, and I don't actually agree with his rule on this holding, but it would work wonders on this example. I do have a long list of when suit preference or count is used at trick one instead of attitude and eventuallly you will need something along those lines as well. But lets assume you do have such a list, but like me, it would not apply with this holding in dummy and the spot card lead.

As to your more general question, this is a deep question. The problem on this hand is you don't want to be endplayed if East has three clubs into giving him a club trick. If East has three clubs, you can be pretty darn sure your partner has two diamonds (else lead top club spot would be more attractive). If your partners hand is something like KJx Axxx 8x xxxx East will play a heart to his TEN at trick two. Your partner wins the ACE. The best defense here is to shift to a club. The ideal defense will allow you to score two spades in your hand (you will make it easy for partner, giving you 3C, 2S, 1H, two diamnod ruffs (one with the king) and a trump promotion for your spade nine.

Likely line.

Trick 1. DA --> signal for switch
Trick 2. H to TEN-ACE
Trick 3. CJ
Trick 4. Diamond Q to King
Trick 5. Heart K
Trick 6. Heart Q with EAST
Trick 7. Spade to TEN-ACE
Trick 8. Low diamond force partner to ruff (not Top diamond)
Trick 9. club to Queen
Trick 10 Club ACE
Trick 11, diamond for partner to ruff with KING
Trick 12. Partner returns 13th club, to promote your spade nine.

The only problem with line of play is when partner is allowed to think on his own. If you play a a discouraging diamond at trick two, he might consider that EAST must have the queen so he might continue a diamond at trick three to set up his diamond ruff. This destroys the timing on the hand so they will get an additional trick. So with a partner who thinks about the hand, you need to signal that you do have the diamond queen, and partner will work out that he doesn't need a ruff (and can't ruff fourth round effectively at this point) and thus he will shift on his own. And with a really clever partner, you might need an alarm clock diamond honor play, but that is for another day.
--Ben--

#8 User is offline   plaur 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 313
  • Joined: 2005-April-03

Posted 2011-July-07, 16:07

Thanks all for nice answers ! Ben, did you ever consider a career as a cardreader :)

I held K64 AT9 86 T7643

When partner discouraged diamonds I put declarer on the the Q and tried to get my ruff. Partner did not think he denied the Q. He just wanted a shift. Asked another partner and he wasnt actually sure whether this was attitude or suit shift situation for us. He would play 2 as it shows the Q or a club shift ... lucky he didnt want a heart switch. The differences of thinking and opinion here was what triggered my question.

As for carding agreements I try to keep them as simple as possible. Think we gain more by knowing when a card is attitude, count or lavinthal rather than having more advanced agreements, that we dont spend time enough to discuss anyway and get all kinds of ambiguity. And besides we still have zillions of other stuff we dont have time to discuss so I believe in KISS :)



Actual hand was scored as down 1. Dont know why. I think we should get down 2 on the play. I might recall the play wrong

Trick 1. to A.
Trick 2. to my K.
Trick 3. to K
Trick 4. to partners A.
Trick 5. Q
Trick 6. to my 9 and dummys K
Trick 7.
Trick 8. to Q and my Ace

http://www.bridge.dk...CG1.html#spil25
0

#9 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,707
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2011-July-07, 21:07

What I did when trying to learn this stuff was read Kantar's Modern Bridge Defense. Then, when I found myself not sure what to do at the table, I read it again. One of these days, I'll get it right. Then I can move on to Advanced Bridge Defense. B-)
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users