BBO Discussion Forums: Is this obvious? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Is this obvious?

#21 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2011-June-17, 08:35

View Posthan, on 2011-June-17, 05:25, said:

How about AKQJTxxxxxx -- -- Ax? 12 tricks in hand and no play for 13 tricks on a spade lead.

Thank you partner, nice hand for 4S bid.


I did not mean to imply that this hand was a 4♠ call. I was merely giving another example of a hand that partner would open 2♣ and my AK - AQ in the red suits will not produce a grand slam. There are a lot of very strong hands with 12 or 13 cards in the black suits which partner could have that fit the auction and are missing a trick. Another example: AKQxxxxx x -- AKJT.

As I stated in a previous post, I did raise partner to slam in spades. Another poster suggested that I cue bid diamonds again over partner's 5♠ bid, implying first round heart control. That might have worked, but I don't believe that partner would have worked it out.
-1
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users