♠Kxx
♥J9x
♦Txxx
♣Axx
partner deals at r/w at matchpoints
1♥-p-2♥-4♠
6♥-p-?
suppose you pass
1♥-p-2♥-4♠
6♥-p-p-6♠
x-p-?
You don't have a ton of agreements/experience with your partner, but your style for 2♥ is probably somewhat constructive, say 7-9 or so. You also play Namyats.
Page 1 of 1
slam decision matchpoints
#2
Posted 2011-May-24, 06:15
both passes are absolutely forced in my book. I wouldn't need to see the hand to decide that. Maybe AKx in hearts would be interesting.
1♥-p-2♥-4♠
6♥-p-p-6♠
p
is inviting us to decide between x and 7♥.
1♥-p-2♥-4♠
6♥-p-p-6♠
p
is inviting us to decide between x and 7♥.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2011-May-24, 09:37
gwnn, on 2011-May-24, 06:15, said:
both passes are absolutely forced in my book. I wouldn't need to see the hand to decide that. Maybe AKx in hearts would be interesting.
1♥-p-2♥-4♠
6♥-p-p-6♠
p
is inviting us to decide between x and 7♥.
1♥-p-2♥-4♠
6♥-p-p-6♠
p
is inviting us to decide between x and 7♥.
It's matchpoints and the question is whether we should bid 6NT, not whether we should bid 7♥.
If partner has a singleton spade we should have enough to make 6NT, if he has a void we should probably pass. If he has a spade void it's hard to find a hand that shouldn't be trying for grand with 5♠. But if he has a spade singleton it's hard to find a hand that shouldn't be bidding 4NT...
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#5
Posted 2011-May-24, 16:51
Sometimes partners gamble and bid 6H, people always come to the conclusion that this was an incorrect strategy but I'm not sure why that is true. Partner has stampeded them into a 6S save, well done I say.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#7
Posted 2011-May-25, 05:29
I thought I'd for once post a hand where I took the normal action (pass/pass) and merely thought about doing something unusual (bidding 6N on either round).
I also came to the conclusion that partner may well have gambled on 6h, which may not have even been making, so I should take my plus.
The defense was a little unfortunate:
♦A on which south played the 7 (udca). low ♥ shift.
Suppose south instead plays the ♦2 at trick 1 and north switches to a club. Declarer ruffs and plays the ♠Q. Any way for north to avoid the heart shift now?
And yes, several people did a lot of bidding on this board.
I also came to the conclusion that partner may well have gambled on 6h, which may not have even been making, so I should take my plus.
The defense was a little unfortunate:
♦A on which south played the 7 (udca). low ♥ shift.
Suppose south instead plays the ♦2 at trick 1 and north switches to a club. Declarer ruffs and plays the ♠Q. Any way for north to avoid the heart shift now?
And yes, several people did a lot of bidding on this board.
Page 1 of 1