BBO Discussion Forums: answering a splinter - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

answering a splinter

#21 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-May-10, 09:20

View PostFree, on 2011-May-10, 07:35, said:

Apparently you don't agree with my statement, but it's a well known fact that opposite a splinter you better have no values rather than an Ace. Let me prove it to you with an example:
Say your partner has AQJT8-3-AKQ-K52. If you have K962-A72-853-Q94 (the example hand), slam has absolutely no play unless you find JT - good luck with that. If you have K962-742-853-AQ9 on the other hand, slam is cold. All I did was switching A with a .


The only reason not to call you any names is that we already showed a stopper, so on this hand it's the best holding, except perhaps JTxx.


Uh, the reason Andy said it's best possible holding is of course exactly that we already promised a heart stopper. A post of "Sorry, I missed that we promised a stopper already" would be more adequate than lecturing Andy about the merits of xxx vs Axx opposite a stopper.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#22 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-May-10, 09:52

View Postgnasher, on 2011-May-10, 07:06, said:

Do you also think we have 9 points more than a minimum, and four more spades than we might have had?


Funniest thing I've read on the forums in a long time, well done.
0

#23 User is offline   jh51 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 231
  • Joined: 2009-November-17

Posted 2011-May-11, 12:56

View PostFree, on 2011-May-10, 07:35, said:

Apparently you don't agree with my statement, but it's a well known fact that opposite a splinter you better have no values rather than an Ace. Let me prove it to you with an example:
Say your partner has AQJT8-3-AKQ-K52. If you have K962-A72-853-Q94 (the example hand), slam has absolutely no play unless you find JT - good luck with that. If you have K962-742-853-AQ9 on the other hand, slam is cold. All I did was switching A with a .


But would you rather have K962-742-853-AQ9 or K962-A42-853-AQ9? In the latter case you have a grand slam and the former a small slam.

If you are saying that it is better to have the Ace in a suit where one of you also has the King than in the splinter suit, that is true. But what I have read is the two holdings you want in the splinter suit are the Ace or no honor card. A King is of questionable value and a Q of no value in assessing slam possibilities. In your hand where the slam is cold, try exchaning the Q with a . Now there is no chance of a slam, where there was at least a small chance when the Ace was opposite a singleton.

Recenly my partner and I bid and made a slam on 24 HCP when we each had Ace and small cards opposite a singelton in partner's hand. I opened, partner splintered, I cue bid my singleton and she bid the slam.
0

#24 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2011-May-12, 01:50

View Postjh51, on 2011-May-11, 12:56, said:

But would you rather have K962-742-853-AQ9 or K962-A42-853-AQ9? In the latter case you have a grand slam and the former a small slam.

The second hand has an extra Ace, ofcourse I want that hand... :blink: You're comparing apples and oranges.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users