BBO Discussion Forums: Both Majors - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Both Majors NZ

#1 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,766
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2011-May-03, 15:35



Would you consider that either 4♦ or 5♦ was taking advantage of the UI?
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#2 User is offline   RMB1 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,841
  • Joined: 2007-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Exeter, UK
  • Interests:EBU/EBL TD
    Bridge, Cinema, Theatre, Food,
    [Walking - not so much]

Posted 2011-May-03, 15:45

Do we know what South intended 2♦ as?
Robin

"Robin Barker is a mathematician. ... All highly skilled in their respective fields and clearly accomplished bridge players."
0

#3 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,766
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2011-May-03, 16:07

I did write it in but its not showing up properly.

2♣ was explained as both majors but intended as any single suited hand

Over 2♣ 2♦ was just equal length
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#4 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2011-May-03, 16:54

 Cascade, on 2011-May-03, 15:35, said:

Would you consider that either 4♦ or 5♦ was taking advantage of the UI?
I've attempted to change the bid explanations (possibly wrongly). Anyway, IMO,
  • 4♦ seems a reasonable bid but just possibly might be construed to be an attempt to wake partner up to the misunderstanding. Pass, however, is also a logical alternative and would be a more effective and unambiguous way of accomplishing that end.
  • 5♦ seems reasonable given that you imagine that you've set diamonds as trumps. 4♥ seems like a cue-bid rather than a belated attempt to play.
There may be a UI problem for the 4♥ bidder. Has partner auto-splintered and now confirmed a void?
Guthrie.tech
1

#5 User is offline   campboy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,347
  • Joined: 2009-July-21

Posted 2011-May-03, 17:08

 nige1, on 2011-May-03, 16:54, said:

There may be a UI problem for the 4♥ bidder. Has partner auto-splintered and now confirmed a void?

He doesn't have UI, though, since 2♦ is alertable either way.
0

#6 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2011-May-04, 09:38

Um, I would like to ask what a direct 4♦ by South would have shown. If it shows this hand, South definitely used the UI. If not, I will have to think about it some more, but probably yes.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users