Help
1. decent opps; both vul:
AJT43 97 9753 98
1♥ pass 2♥ 3♦
3♥ ???
2. Q7 KJT8 A872 Q84
We are vul;
Pass 1♣* pass 1♥**
pass 2♥**pass pass
dbl pass 2NT dbl
pass pass 3♣ pass
pass ????
*polish club
** 7+pc, 4+hearts
*** 12-14pc and exactly 4 hearts, balanced
What now ?
Especially the first one is interesting to me. I suppose I know what the correct action is in 2nd but just want to double check this.
Page 1 of 1
Two matchpoint hands
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,083
- Joined: 2006-August-31
- Gender:Male
- Location:Santiago, Chile
- Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.
Posted 2011-May-01, 16:17
3♠ & Pass. I think partner should have a nice hand for coming in at the three lvl and we could support at the 4 lvl, so why not name our spades. Partner can't expect too much from us as we passed on our first turn. Pass on the second one 'cause the hand is ugly to compete and we don't quite have a penalty so doubling might be dangerous.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#3
- 2011 Poster of The Year winner
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,002
- Joined: 2010-July-08
- Gender:Male
#4
- Under bidder
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,797
- Joined: 2004-July-25
- Gender:Male
- Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posted 2011-May-02, 02:26
Is AJ10xx not good enough to follow 1S these days?
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,211
- Joined: 2006-April-22
Posted 2011-May-02, 05:40
1. Make the bid that shows Little hand with spade suit and Diamond fit.
2. Wish the first response transferred opener to declare.
The lead values just about justify 3H.
Pass since partner declares. And he did not suggest DT's.
2. Wish the first response transferred opener to declare.
The lead values just about justify 3H.
Pass since partner declares. And he did not suggest DT's.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,555
- Joined: 2007-January-22
Posted 2011-May-02, 07:44
Quote
3S and pass both seem super obv
Interesting, my friends are convinced that double is 100% action on 2nd beacuse partner doubled 2NT bid expressing his desire to double them.
Quote
Is AJ10xx not good enough to follow 1S these days?
Well, we are vulnerable and it's matchpoints so we have to play much tighter than at imps. I think 1♠ is a bit too much especially at MP's.
Quote
Wish the first response transferred opener to declare.
I dunno. Usually it's better for 12-14balanced hand to be dummy imo but it doesn't matter anyway in polish club you have no choice.
Quote
Pass since partner declares. And he did not suggest DT's.
I don't get it all. I can't see how it matters that much that partner is going to declarer and I don't know what "DT's" are but if you mean defensive tricks I think partner suggested them by doubling 2NT.
#7
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2011-May-02, 08:17
On the second one, we can be fairly sure that partner is 4=4=2=3. The opponents' bidding suggests that they don't have eight spades, so that gives partner four of them. RHO apparently has equal length in the minors, and LHO can't have two more clubs than he has diamonds. Hence partner must be 4=4=2=3 rather than 4=4=3=2.
I wouldn't call it obvious, but that suggests to me that we should double.
I wouldn't call it obvious, but that suggests to me that we should double.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,214
- Joined: 2007-December-16
- Location:Pasadena, CA
Posted 2011-May-02, 10:07
gnasher, on 2011-May-02, 08:17, said:
On the second one, we can be fairly sure that partner is 4=4=2=3. The opponents' bidding suggests that they don't have eight spades, so that gives partner four of them. RHO apparently has equal length in the minors, and LHO can't have two more clubs than he has diamonds. Hence partner must be 4=4=2=3 rather than 4=4=3=2.
I wouldn't call it obvious, but that suggests to me that we should double.
I wouldn't call it obvious, but that suggests to me that we should double.
I agree, if the worst case is that partner is 4432 after some strange opponent bidding, and partner is very likely to be 4423, I will take my chances.
#9
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 431
- Joined: 2008-November-02
Posted 2011-May-02, 12:00
So 2NT is natural?
RHO:4=1=4=4 LHO: 3=4=2=4 PARD: 4=4=3=2
feels more likely than
RHO:4=2=4=3 LHO: 3=3=3=4 PARD: 4=4=2=3
RHO:4=1=4=4 LHO: 3=4=2=4 PARD: 4=4=3=2
feels more likely than
RHO:4=2=4=3 LHO: 3=3=3=4 PARD: 4=4=2=3
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..." --sathyab
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,555
- Joined: 2007-January-22
Posted 2011-May-02, 12:27
Quote
So 2NT is natural?
No it isn't. I mean it wasn't alerted but still it was clear for everybody at the table that it is scrambling.
#11
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2011-May-02, 12:43
3♠ and i agree with Andy on the second one.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#12
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2011-May-02, 17:25
the first one is very close to me, our weakness suggests partner is quite heavy. Depending on how agressive is partner we should either pass and let him make his move to avoid getting too high, or act now if he is likelly to pass with a good hand.
The second one pass is a loser. Opponents have found a good defence over our partscore and passing can't beat 2♥. We have to act either way so it is double or 3♥. I lean towards double.
The second one pass is a loser. Opponents have found a good defence over our partscore and passing can't beat 2♥. We have to act either way so it is double or 3♥. I lean towards double.
#13
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 431
- Joined: 2008-November-02
Posted 2011-May-03, 06:44
bluecalm, on 2011-May-02, 12:27, said:
No it isn't. I mean it wasn't alerted but still it was clear for everybody at the table that it is scrambling.
Did RHO double on 5=2=3=3? 4=3=3=3? something strange is going on.
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..." --sathyab
#14
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2011-May-03, 07:01
It wouldn't be surprising to find that LHO is 4333. He didn't make a takeout double on the first round, so there's going to be something odd about it.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#15
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,316
- Joined: 2011-March-01
- Gender:Male
- Interests:student of the game
Posted 2011-May-03, 08:36
bluecalm, on 2011-May-02, 07:44, said:
Interesting, my friends are convinced that double is 100% action on 2nd beacuse partner doubled 2NT bid expressing his desire to double them.
I agree with your friends. If we can make 2H, 3C making -110 isn't earning us many matchpoints. What we don't want is 3C-2 +100 for below average.
#16
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,211
- Joined: 2006-April-22
Posted 2011-May-03, 09:03
"I don't get it all. I can't see how it matters that much that partner is going to declarer and I don't know what "DT's" are but if you mean defensive tricks I think partner suggested them by doubling 2NT." -- bluecalm
** Yes DT's are defensive tricks. Sorry my cryptic mislead.
Yes DT's suggested if 2NT was not scrambling.
Wasn't many other bids strong, so 2NT is weak.
I mean which problem hand can only be handled with 2NT strong.
Many weak scramble hands.
Generally even 12-14bal has more tenaces than 7,
let alone the 1C may be much bigger.
** Yes DT's are defensive tricks. Sorry my cryptic mislead.
Yes DT's suggested if 2NT was not scrambling.
Wasn't many other bids strong, so 2NT is weak.
I mean which problem hand can only be handled with 2NT strong.
Many weak scramble hands.
Generally even 12-14bal has more tenaces than 7,
let alone the 1C may be much bigger.
Page 1 of 1