BBO Discussion Forums: A defensive problem - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

A defensive problem

#1 User is offline   Rossoneri 

  • Wabbit
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2007-January-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 2011-April-20, 05:03

Say you decide to lead the T from AT9xx against a NT contract. Dummy comes down with 3 small. Partner overtakes with the J and declarer plays the K. What would you place partner with?

Would it matter if your agreements are modified slightly from standard so that from a suit headed by T9 you would lead the 9 instead?
SCBA National TD, EBU Club TD

Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
0

#2 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2011-April-20, 09:37

Since he is unblocking, I would place my partner with QJx or Jx, or, worst case, just J. Hopefully we play some sort of Smith so that it clarifies the situation.
Chris Gibson
0

#3 User is offline   Rossoneri 

  • Wabbit
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2007-January-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 2011-April-20, 18:22

View PostCSGibson, on 2011-April-20, 09:37, said:

Since he is unblocking, I would place my partner with QJx or Jx, or, worst case, just J. Hopefully we play some sort of Smith so that it clarifies the situation.


Well, what if you are not playing Smith?

Also, you would play the same even in the second case?
SCBA National TD, EBU Club TD

Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
0

#4 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-April-21, 16:08

Never mind.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#5 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-April-21, 16:16

You don't know if partner has the queen or not. He has to play the jack from Jx to unblock for this exact scenario.

If you have no way of signalling later whether he has the queen or not, you have to just play bridge and figure out what to play. If you are playing imps and your only hope of beating the contract is him having QJ, just go for it. If you have some other play, then try to figure out which is your best shot. All you know is that partner might or might not have QJx, QJ, Jx, or stiff J
2

#6 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2011-April-22, 13:19

What JLOGIC said.

If you play strong 10s (so the 10 promises at least one higher honour) then partner can play low safely from QJx, so the Jack is either Jx, J or QJ. (With Qx partner has to play the q to unblock). You still won't know if partner has QJx or declarer has KQJ, in that case.

If you don't play strong 10s, then partner has to play an honour from QJx in case declarer has the AK, otherwise the suit gets blocked.
0

#7 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2011-April-22, 19:42

View PostRossoneri, on 2011-April-20, 18:22, said:

Well, what if you are not playing Smith?


Then I recommend playing Smith so that you have a way to solve these problems.
Chris Gibson
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users