Something
#1
Posted 2011-April-14, 04:06
1H - (2D) - Dbl -(pass)
??
KJxx
AQ10xx
xxx
A
Your call?
- hrothgar
#2
Posted 2011-April-14, 04:31
Close, depends somewhat on, how much in a habit partner and I am, biddng 2♠ on a three-card-suit.
I play that 2♠ virtually guarantees 4. Combined with that xxx in Diamonds is bad, we are white, and that the♣A may not pull it's full weight, I choose the conservative option.
Stating the obvious (well, obvious to an overbidder like me): ♠KJxx/♥AQ10xx/♦x/♣Axx is a clear 3♠.
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#3
Posted 2011-April-14, 04:59
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#4
Posted 2011-April-14, 08:56
Hate 4531 primes not jumping to let partner know 'good stuff'.
#5
Posted 2011-April-14, 08:57
First, I am about a King above minimum. Throw out the spade King, and I have an opening bid.
Second, when the takeout double is of a 2♦ overcall of a major, Opener has less space to unwind and will frequently bid a 3-card major. What else with the exact same honors (perhaps with the heart Queen instead a small heart) and 3-5-1-4 shape?
Third, I wouldn't double as frequently with Responder's hand as many. With just four spades, I can wait for a reopening double.
So, my tendency, perhaps, of lighter initial actions and more conservative use of a negative double in this sequence compels me to bid 3♠. That may well be a downside to the approach. Pros and cons.
-P.J. Painter.
#6
Posted 2011-April-14, 09:10
kenrexford, on 2011-April-14, 08:57, said:
First, I am about a King above minimum. Throw out the spade King, and I have an opening bid.
Second, when the takeout double is of a 2♦ overcall of a major, Opener has less space to unwind and will frequently bid a 3-card major. What else with the exact same honors (perhaps with the heart Queen instead a small heart) and 3-5-1-4 shape?
Third, I wouldn't double as frequently with Responder's hand as many. With just four spades, I can wait for a reopening double.
So, my tendency, perhaps, of lighter initial actions and more conservative use of a negative double in this sequence compels me to bid 3♠. That may well be a downside to the approach. Pros and cons.
You must be 100% wrong because I am in complete agreement with you especially regarding how bad a 2♠ call could be when we actually want to encourage partner.
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#7
Posted 2011-April-14, 09:23
3♠
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#9
Posted 2011-April-14, 14:23
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#10
Posted 2011-April-15, 04:28
- hrothgar
#11
Posted 2011-April-15, 05:57
-P.J. Painter.
#12
Posted 2011-April-15, 09:46
han, on 2011-April-15, 04:28, said:
I think your 3♠ is clearer than 4♠.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#14
Posted 2011-April-15, 13:39
han, on 2011-April-14, 04:06, said:
.1H - (2D) - Dbl -(pass)
??
han, on 2011-April-15, 04:28, said: