JT963 T6 9842 85
#1
Posted 2011-April-08, 10:09
1S P 2C (3D) 3H ?
my hand is JT963 T6 9842 85
We play fairly undisciplined, aggressive but not overly so. Should I further the preempt here? How high?
#2
Posted 2011-April-08, 11:21
-P.J. Painter.
#3
Posted 2011-April-08, 11:33
#4
Posted 2011-April-08, 11:46
straube, on 2011-April-08, 11:33, said:
Whew!
In any auction, one could interfere with the opponents' bidding. I mean, with 4333 and a yarb, you could overcall a 2NT opening by bidding your 4-card suit. That would ruin their chances of an unimpeded auction to whatever end contract they might otherwise reach.
-P.J. Painter.
#8
Posted 2011-April-08, 14:37
#9
Posted 2011-April-08, 15:03
aguahombre, on 2011-April-08, 14:37, said:
Or at least take away their cue with 4♦. Any big jump risks a larger number against their game / slam.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2011-April-08, 15:09
#11
Posted 2011-April-08, 16:18
I'd personally go with 5♦. After all pd is suggesting a save, i have 4 trumps of his preempt suit and not 1 single defensive trick, not even a fourth round of defensive trick and i am far from being 4333 or 5332
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#12
Posted 2011-April-08, 16:25
4♦ is probably safe, because LHO won't want to defend at the four level when he hasn't shown his heart support.
#13
Posted 2011-April-08, 17:16
gnasher, on 2011-April-08, 16:25, said:
4♦ is probably safe, because LHO won't want to defend at the four level when he hasn't shown his heart support.
-920 or -940 -980 is even worse, but i maybe resulting. Hard to be objective when knowing they make grand.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#14
Posted 2011-April-08, 19:48
cherdano, on 2011-April-08, 15:09, said:
Nope. I still pass. I'm just rather shocked that others keep bidding.
-P.J. Painter.
#15
Posted 2011-April-08, 20:07
#16
Posted 2011-April-08, 21:44
aguahombre, on 2011-April-08, 20:07, said:
Your partners bid 3♦ here with AKxxx?
#17
Posted 2011-April-08, 22:52
#18
Posted 2011-April-09, 01:08
Anyway, even if they have slam on, that doesn't mean that -800 will score well - nobody said this was the final of the World Pairs. Also, it might be 1100, eg xx xx AQJxxxx xx.
#19
Posted 2011-April-09, 02:23
kenrexford, on 2011-April-08, 19:48, said:
What do you think partner's 3♦ shows?
I would just bid 4♦, anyway.