IMPs, w/r, 2nd seat
Axxx AJ9x Jxx Kx
1D X XX* 2C
2D P 3D P
3N AP
*4+ hearts
Your lead.
Page 1 of 1
Lead Problem
#2
Posted 2011-March-22, 17:45
I guess I lead the ♣K. Partner's 2♣ is a free bid, akin to if dummy had bid 1♥. So his suit should be respectable.
Of course, this lead could be disastrous, but everything else looks worse.
Of course, this lead could be disastrous, but everything else looks worse.
#3
Posted 2011-March-22, 17:54
Quote
Partner's 2♣ is a free bid
Many people (me included) play that passing rdbl is for business if opener is in minor suit. I wouldn't risk passing if we hadn't discussed it for sure.
That is especially true if rdbl shows hearts. No reason why I shouldn't pass with diamonds.
It could be one of those deals where we just cash 4 hearts and A♠. Maybe it's fancy but I lead A♥. I don't believe we run clubs so partner will need an entry which is probably in hearts anyway.
#4
Posted 2011-March-22, 18:02
small spade for me. Trying to set up partner's Q10xxx is mularkey.
I suppose it also depends on style, whether partner can anticipate your club shortness and still bid 2C after a xx, etc.
But in a vacuum I'm leading the spade.
I suppose it also depends on style, whether partner can anticipate your club shortness and still bid 2C after a xx, etc.
But in a vacuum I'm leading the spade.
Aaron Jones Unit 557
www.longbeachbridge.com
www.longbeachbridge.com
#5
Posted 2011-March-22, 18:33
I am definitely leading a heart, the only question is which heart.
I dislike a club lead (partner bid clubs in response to our takeout double, no doubt he hoped we had more than 2 clubs, also he is unlikely to have the entries to set up and run the clubs. I also dislike a spade lead (Ace empty 4th is not my idea of an attractive lead). A passive diamond is plausible but I would prefer to try to set up some tricks.
I like the Ace lead. It scores a big win against declarer's singleton King, but (with 4 hearts on our left, and probably - no support double - only one or two with declarer) often it doesn't give away more tricks than a low heart. Anyway, leading the Ace instead of a low one is easier to do on the forums than at the table, so I might as well take my chance to lead it here.
I dislike a club lead (partner bid clubs in response to our takeout double, no doubt he hoped we had more than 2 clubs, also he is unlikely to have the entries to set up and run the clubs. I also dislike a spade lead (Ace empty 4th is not my idea of an attractive lead). A passive diamond is plausible but I would prefer to try to set up some tricks.
I like the Ace lead. It scores a big win against declarer's singleton King, but (with 4 hearts on our left, and probably - no support double - only one or two with declarer) often it doesn't give away more tricks than a low heart. Anyway, leading the Ace instead of a low one is easier to do on the forums than at the table, so I might as well take my chance to lead it here.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#6
Posted 2011-March-22, 19:28
655321, on 2011-March-22, 18:33, said:
I am definitely leading a heart, the only question is which heart.
I dislike a club lead (partner bid clubs in response to our takeout double, no doubt he hoped we had more than 2 clubs, also he is unlikely to have the entries to set up and run the clubs. I also dislike a spade lead (Ace empty 4th is not my idea of an attractive lead). A passive diamond is plausible but I would prefer to try to set up some tricks.
I like the Ace lead. It scores a big win against declarer's singleton King, but (with 4 hearts on our left, and probably - no support double - only one or two with declarer) often it doesn't give away more tricks than a low heart. Anyway, leading the Ace instead of a low one is easier to do on the forums than at the table, so I might as well take my chance to lead it here.
I dislike a club lead (partner bid clubs in response to our takeout double, no doubt he hoped we had more than 2 clubs, also he is unlikely to have the entries to set up and run the clubs. I also dislike a spade lead (Ace empty 4th is not my idea of an attractive lead). A passive diamond is plausible but I would prefer to try to set up some tricks.
I like the Ace lead. It scores a big win against declarer's singleton King, but (with 4 hearts on our left, and probably - no support double - only one or two with declarer) often it doesn't give away more tricks than a low heart. Anyway, leading the Ace instead of a low one is easier to do on the forums than at the table, so I might as well take my chance to lead it here.
wot he said
#7
Posted 2011-March-23, 03:52
leading a club looks wrong when we have all the entries. Either a spade or a heart could be right. A heart probably needs less.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
#8
Posted 2011-March-26, 13:07
I thought of replying but then I couldn't be bothered to read the messy layout
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dd20/0dd207db57e6c9c8de9c9d0b4299e4c8282a573e" alt=":P"
Page 1 of 1