[Jaom]

IMP

---

BUT! Let me say one thing - ALL BIDS ARE NON FORCING.
Both 2♠ and 2♣ show stronger hand

Is that enought for us?

[helene_t]

I don't understand this problem. 2♠ is a weird bid. We seem to be playing some exotic system.

Playing normal methods, I bid 3NT. I think 3♦ should be invitational.

[Jaom]

helene_t, on 2011-February-26, 16:02, said:

I don't understand this problem. 2♠ is a weird bid. We seem to be playing some exotic system.

Yep, a friend of mine said that the best solution in this case is changing our system to anything usable. xD Nevertheless, we had such an agreament (stupid or not).

[Bbradley62]

Jaom, on 2011-February-26, 15:38, said:

Both 2♠ and 2♣ show stronger hand

Since you seem to have unusual agreements, we need to know exactly what 2♣ and 2♠ show in order to figure out what to do next.

[helene_t]

Agree with Bbradley.

BTW, you shouldn't put polls like this one in the Bridge Polls Online forum. This subforum is meant for 'Master-Solvers-Club'-like bidding polls.

Just use "interesting bridge hands", "general bridge discussion" or maybe "expert/advanced" or "beginner/intermediate".