BBO Discussion Forums: Balancing with 5-1-4-3 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Balancing with 5-1-4-3

Poll: Balancing with 5-1-4-3 (44 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you bid?

  1. Pass (8 votes [18.18%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 18.18%

  2. Double (12 votes [27.27%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 27.27%

  3. 4S (24 votes [54.55%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 54.55%

  4. Other (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2011-February-14, 10:02

Hey all,

Been a while since I last posted so I thought I'd put up a problem that has divided the experts I know.

You hold
AKJxx
x
xxxx
Qxx

IMPs, nil all, LHO deals and bids 4 hearts:

(4) - pass - (pass) - ?
0

#2 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,232
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2011-February-14, 10:10

I wouldn't pass but as for dbl vs 4 I don't feel strongly about it.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#3 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2011-February-14, 12:59

I just think it's funny that either our side's bids are in parentheses or we're about to call out of turn :)

edit: I can live with either also. I prefer X to invite partner into the discussion (or in case he has a trap pass), but I think we'll get a level too high too often, so in practice I'll probably try 4S.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#4 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2011-February-14, 17:24

View Postwyman, on 2011-February-14, 12:59, said:

I just think it's funny that either our side's bids are in parentheses or we're about to call out of turn :)


Ah thanks - fixed now
0

#5 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-February-14, 17:51

It's a guess and my guess is dbl.
0

#6 User is offline   daveharty 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 694
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ann Arbor, MI
  • Interests:Bridge, juggling, disc sports, Jane Austen, writing, cosmology, and Mexican food

Posted 2011-February-17, 13:25

4S, accept the transfer.
Revised Bridge Personality: 44 43 33 44

Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-February-17, 14:46

4, with this suit quality we will hardly be doubled. Double is acceptable with bad spades and/or a defensive hand.
0

#8 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2011-February-18, 04:51

Simulation time but unfortunately I am not at home and can't run it.
My wild guess is 4S.
0

#9 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-February-18, 06:27

I'd double, and I don't like 4 at all. If I bid 4, partner will pass it, almost regardless of what he has.

This is a bit simplistic, but in terms of getting us to a sensible contract:
- Double gains when partner has 0, 1 or 2 spades.
- 4 gains when partner has three spades but would take out a double to five of a minor, and when partner has four spades but would leave in a double.
- When he has three spades and would pass a double, it's probably about evens whether we want to bid 4 or not, so either action might be right.

To me, that doesn't seem very close.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#10 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2011-February-18, 06:42

Though I admitted that I was tempted to pass after thinking about double and 4, a simulation showed me that 4 is better because when it doesn't make it usually turns out to be a good sacrifice. Minors suck according to that simulation.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#11 User is offline   xxhong 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 328
  • Joined: 2010-November-11

Posted 2011-February-18, 16:47

It won't be an easy problem to do simulations. First you really need to know your opps' style.
Do they preempt too much, which means that they overbid with many many 7 card broken H suit( or even some 6 card suit)? If that's the case, the chance would be that they most likely can't make 4H and your chance to make 4S is also rather slim. So against such opps, pass would be good.
If they are really serious with their 4H openings and often preempt on the heavy side of the whole spectrum, you should probably bid 4S, because they may have a tough time to double you when they can probably make 4H. However, you also need to know about your RHO, does he make very light penalty doubles purely based on trump stacks? If that's the case, you should just pass and wait for the nuts. If he is a very conservative doubler ( could be due to his partner's aggressiveness), you should tend to bid 4S again. Without any information, it would be just a guess and any of the three bids can work very well or very badly, well, perhaps not the pass.
0

#12 User is offline   AlexJonson 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 496
  • Joined: 2010-November-03

Posted 2011-February-18, 16:52

4S seemed immediately clearly to me.

Little reasoning, so I could easily be persuaded that a champion had a reason to do something different, whatever that might be.
0

#13 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,664
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2011-February-18, 21:24

At MP if u wish to pass and try to set it is perfectly fine but at IMPS (only 1 board) it is a much scarier proposition
because we could easily be losing a double game swing so we need to take out insurance.

4s seems to be the best insurance with good quality suit it is hard for opps to x

we can make game on as little as

xxxxx
xxx
Ax
Axx

and have to hope to set 4h 1 trick
0

#14 User is offline   wclass___ 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 431
  • Joined: 2008-November-02

Posted 2011-February-19, 03:36

Pass.
xxxx Qxx sucks for offense, and AKJxx is also quite defensive.
LHO probably didn't bid 4 with 7222, so expect something to break badly.
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..." --sathyab
0

#15 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2011-February-19, 04:32

View Postgszes, on 2011-February-18, 21:24, said:

At MP if u wish to pass and try to set it is perfectly fine but at IMPS (only 1 board) it is a much scarier proposition
because we could easily be losing a double game swing so we need to take out insurance.

4s seems to be the best insurance with good quality suit it is hard for opps to x

we can make game on as little as

xxxxx
xxx
Ax
Axx

and have to hope to set 4h 1 trick

With this hand you'll play in 4 opposite a double anyway.
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#16 User is offline   tolvyrj 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 175
  • Joined: 2003-October-20

Posted 2011-February-21, 18:00

If i am going to bid anything... lets say yes; its 4. And why, because prd leaves it in with as little as 2 trump tricks and my hand represent 1 trick in defence.
0

#17 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2011-February-24, 02:49

Thanks to everyone for their replies.

With the hand I doubled, and partner put me in 6, reasoning that I should be much stronger to double. I appreciate that this is an irrelevant piece of information for the thread, but I like a bit of closure.

The general consensus locally was that 4 is probably the `correct' but, with a few diehard doublers. Very few passers, I guess around the same margin as the 19% of votes here.

Ant.
0

#18 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2011-February-24, 02:58

View PostAnt590, on 2011-February-24, 02:49, said:

Thanks to everyone for their replies.

With the hand I doubled, and partner put me in 6, reasoning that I should be much stronger to double. I appreciate that this is an irrelevant piece of information for the thread, but I like a bit of closure.

The general consensus locally was that 4 is probably the `correct' but, with a few diehard doublers. Very few passers, I guess around the same margin as the 19% of votes here.

Ant.

What did your partner have for the 6 bid?
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#19 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2011-February-24, 03:10

View Postgnasher, on 2011-February-18, 06:27, said:

I'd double, and I don't like 4 at all. If I bid 4, partner will pass it, almost regardless of what he has.

This is a bit simplistic, but in terms of getting us to a sensible contract:
- Double gains when partner has 0, 1 or 2 spades.
- 4 gains when partner has three spades but would take out a double to five of a minor, and when partner has four spades but would leave in a double.
- When he has three spades and would pass a double, it's probably about evens whether we want to bid 4 or not, so either action might be right.

To me, that doesn't seem very close.

But is it really likely, for instance, that partner has 0 or 1 spade?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#20 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-February-24, 09:21

your partner is one of those like me that like to apss and then punish partner for reopning lol.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users