Balancing with 5-1-4-3
#1
Posted 2011-February-14, 10:02
Been a while since I last posted so I thought I'd put up a problem that has divided the experts I know.
You hold
♠AKJxx
♥x
♦xxxx
♣Qxx
IMPs, nil all, LHO deals and bids 4 hearts:
(4♥) - pass - (pass) - ?
#2
Posted 2011-February-14, 10:10
#3
Posted 2011-February-14, 12:59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0731/f07315330c72d721a433df91b1dcf64ddc348248" alt=":)"
edit: I can live with either also. I prefer X to invite partner into the discussion (or in case he has a trap pass), but I think we'll get a level too high too often, so in practice I'll probably try 4S.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#6
Posted 2011-February-17, 13:25
Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
#7
Posted 2011-February-17, 14:46
#8
Posted 2011-February-18, 04:51
My wild guess is 4S.
#9
Posted 2011-February-18, 06:27
This is a bit simplistic, but in terms of getting us to a sensible contract:
- Double gains when partner has 0, 1 or 2 spades.
- 4♠ gains when partner has three spades but would take out a double to five of a minor, and when partner has four spades but would leave in a double.
- When he has three spades and would pass a double, it's probably about evens whether we want to bid 4♠ or not, so either action might be right.
To me, that doesn't seem very close.
#10
Posted 2011-February-18, 06:42
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#11
Posted 2011-February-18, 16:47
Do they preempt too much, which means that they overbid with many many 7 card broken H suit( or even some 6 card suit)? If that's the case, the chance would be that they most likely can't make 4H and your chance to make 4S is also rather slim. So against such opps, pass would be good.
If they are really serious with their 4H openings and often preempt on the heavy side of the whole spectrum, you should probably bid 4S, because they may have a tough time to double you when they can probably make 4H. However, you also need to know about your RHO, does he make very light penalty doubles purely based on trump stacks? If that's the case, you should just pass and wait for the nuts. If he is a very conservative doubler ( could be due to his partner's aggressiveness), you should tend to bid 4S again. Without any information, it would be just a guess and any of the three bids can work very well or very badly, well, perhaps not the pass.
#12
Posted 2011-February-18, 16:52
Little reasoning, so I could easily be persuaded that a champion had a reason to do something different, whatever that might be.
#13
Posted 2011-February-18, 21:24
because we could easily be losing a double game swing so we need to take out insurance.
4s seems to be the best insurance with good quality suit it is hard for opps to x
we can make game on as little as
xxxxx
xxx
Ax
Axx
and have to hope to set 4h 1 trick
#14
Posted 2011-February-19, 03:36
♦xxxx ♣Qxx sucks for offense, and ♠AKJxx is also quite defensive.
LHO probably didn't bid 4♥ with 7222, so expect something to break badly.
#15
Posted 2011-February-19, 04:32
gszes, on 2011-February-18, 21:24, said:
because we could easily be losing a double game swing so we need to take out insurance.
4s seems to be the best insurance with good quality suit it is hard for opps to x
we can make game on as little as
xxxxx
xxx
Ax
Axx
and have to hope to set 4h 1 trick
With this hand you'll play in 4♠ opposite a double anyway.
London UK
#16
Posted 2011-February-21, 18:00
#17
Posted 2011-February-24, 02:49
With the hand I doubled, and partner put me in 6♠, reasoning that I should be much stronger to double. I appreciate that this is an irrelevant piece of information for the thread, but I like a bit of closure.
The general consensus locally was that 4♠ is probably the `correct' but, with a few diehard doublers. Very few passers, I guess around the same margin as the 19% of votes here.
Ant.
#18
Posted 2011-February-24, 02:58
Ant590, on 2011-February-24, 02:49, said:
With the hand I doubled, and partner put me in 6♠, reasoning that I should be much stronger to double. I appreciate that this is an irrelevant piece of information for the thread, but I like a bit of closure.
The general consensus locally was that 4♠ is probably the `correct' but, with a few diehard doublers. Very few passers, I guess around the same margin as the 19% of votes here.
Ant.
What did your partner have for the 6♠ bid?
London UK
#19
Posted 2011-February-24, 03:10
gnasher, on 2011-February-18, 06:27, said:
This is a bit simplistic, but in terms of getting us to a sensible contract:
- Double gains when partner has 0, 1 or 2 spades.
- 4♠ gains when partner has three spades but would take out a double to five of a minor, and when partner has four spades but would leave in a double.
- When he has three spades and would pass a double, it's probably about evens whether we want to bid 4♠ or not, so either action might be right.
To me, that doesn't seem very close.
But is it really likely, for instance, that partner has 0 or 1 spade?
George Carlin
#20
Posted 2011-February-24, 09:21