[Elianna]

Why can I only agree with ten posts/day?

And if there is a limit, why can't I go and undo some of my "likes" when I find a post that was better than my previous top ten? Am I expected to read everything and then pick out the best 10? This is pretty silly, and having a limit is even sillier!

Normally I barely use 3 a day (and only on those days when I bother reading the forums, which is actually down to many fewer days than it used to be since the new interface was introduced, which was a new subject) but sometimes I read more and wish to use it more!

I just don't understand why there's a limit. Is it really a concern that someone will state that they like a lot of posts? Why would that matter?

[Rain]

10/day was an arbitrarily chosen number that seemed enough for most people when we begun. We are open to increasing it to a higher number, or better, give more active users more votes (though not sure how to do this without creating more groups). But there will be some tangible limit so that it will feel like a positive vote is meaningful.

[TimG]

I'd be happy to sell my daily positive votes. Cheap.

[Elianna]

Rain, on 2010-December-15, 20:24, said:

10/day was an arbitrarily chosen number that seemed enough for most people when we begun. We are open to increasing it to a higher number, or better, give more active users more votes (though not sure how to do this without creating more groups). But there will be some tangible limit so that it will feel like a positive vote is meaningful.

See, this is what really gets me.

"Give more active users more votes"?!?!?! They don't need a vote, THEY POST!!!! It's people who read all the posts but don't feel the need to repeat what others say who need more votes!

"there will be some tangible limit so that it will feel like a positive vote is meaningful" What does that mean? Do you REALLY think that people will just go and upvote every post and that this will somehow dilute the idea of positive votes?

[matmat]

I feel like i used 20% of my quota on a good cause today.

[Elianna]

matmat, on 2010-December-15, 21:35, said:

I feel like i used 20% of my quota on a good cause today.

Oooh, mine must have reset, because I was able to return the favor!

[mtvesuvius]

I'm with Elianna on this. Honestly, I don't usually use more than 5 or 6 plus votes a day, but there are times when I feel that many posts on a given day "deserve" an up-vote.

I give plus votes for a number of reasons, but as Elianna and Matmat said, it is often used to agree without posting "I agree with everything XXX said". It would be nice if plus-votes could be non-anonymous as well if possible. Similar to the way a Public Poll is displayed. This way it could truly be used as an "I agree with" statement, and not just an anonymous way of making people respect the post more (although it usually will have the same effect)

I don't believe that removing the limit will dilute the value of plus votes, since people use them sparingly in the first place. Perhaps this is because of the limit, but there is only one way to find out...

One last quick request is that I'd like to be able to go to a member profile and "Find Upvoted Posts", or at least be able to search by number of plus-votes. This would be a good way to find some of the most valuable material in the recent forum history.

[Elianna]

mtvesuvius, on 2010-December-15, 21:47, said:

I'm with Elianna on this. Honestly, I don't usually use more than 5 or 6 plus votes a day, but there are times when I feel that many posts on a given day "deserve" an up-vote.

I give plus votes for a number of reasons, but as Elianna and Matmat said, it is often used to agree without posting "I agree with everything XXX said". It would be nice if plus-votes could be non-anonymous as well if possible. Similar to the way a Public Poll is displayed. This way it could truly be used as an "I agree with" statement, and not just an anonymous way of making people respect the post more (although it usually will have the same effect)

I don't believe that removing the limit will dilute the value of plus votes, since people use them sparingly in the first place. Perhaps this is because of the limit, but there is only one way to find out...

One last quick request is that I'd like to be able to go to a member profile and "Find Upvoted Posts", or at least be able to search by number of plus-votes. This would be a good way to find some of the most valuable material in the recent forum history.

I'm still out of votes so I can only say that I agree by adding more words to this thread.

[TimG]

mtvesuvius, on 2010-December-15, 21:47, said:

One last quick request is that I'd like to be able to go to a member profile and "Find Upvoted Posts", or at least be able to search by number of plus-votes. This would be a good way to find some of the most valuable material in the recent forum history.

I searched my content last night in an attempt to find out which of my posts had been given an upvote. The upvotes aren't displayed in search results, let alone being an option for sorting. Like you, I think it would be a useful feature.

I would prefer upvotes remain anonymous (even though I am curious). I think some people who don't post would also not vote if they knew people would see their name attached to a vote. But, an anonymous upvote meaning "I found this post useful" is valuable.

[mgoetze]

TimG, on 2010-December-16, 06:38, said:

I searched my content last night in an attempt to find out which of my posts had been given an upvote. The upvotes aren't displayed in search results, let alone being an option for sorting. Like you, I think it would be a useful feature.

But why are you guys getting votes for this? I didn't get any upvotes the last two times I asked for this. Are people biased against me?

Also, congratulations to Elianna on improving her reputation from 0 to 12 with a single thread. But as I think these values may quickly get useless if there is too much voting, I would be more in favour of reducing the quota than increasing it.

[gwnn]

I just heard on the street - do people really get free likes here?

[gwnn]

TimG, on 2010-December-16, 06:38, said:

I searched my content last night in an attempt to find out which of my posts had been given an upvote. The upvotes aren't displayed in search results, let alone being an option for sorting. Like you, I think it would be a useful feature.

I would prefer upvotes remain anonymous (even though I am curious). I think some people who don't post would also not vote if they knew people would see their name attached to a vote. But, an anonymous upvote meaning "I found this post useful" is valuable.

Agree with this 100% - I want to know what posts of mine people like, so that I can improve them. Of course, this is all theoretical, it's hard to see how anyone could improve any of my posts.

[helene_t]

TimG, on 2010-December-15, 21:16, said:

I'd be happy to sell my daily positive votes. Cheap.

FIFA is in another thread.

[mgoetze]

gwnn, on 2010-December-16, 09:40, said:

Agree with this 100% - I want to know what posts of mine people like, so that I can improve them. Of course, this is all theoretical, it's hard to see how anyone could improvelike any of my posts.

Improved your post.

[gwnn]

Yes, that too.

[Rain]

http://www.bridgebas...841#entry515841

Vote limit increased to 20 for those with >1000 posts.

You can argue that a more frequent reader than poster needs the ability to upvote more than the other. However, a forum needs to track user activity in some ways. Since there is no easy way to track how many posts each person reads, most forums will track it with post count or some other stat like that. The more post count you have, the more activity you are assumed to have (in general), and so demonstrate the need for some permissions those with lighter usage don't require.

There also need to exist a limit. If the limit is something like 1000 votes/day, would a positive vote count as much?

The votes are per day, and most posts don't disappear - if you care so much about a post, and have used up your votes, come back the next day and vote for it with a fresh supply.

On searching for votes/non anon votes/editing votes - don't seem at first glance to be possible. Not going to spend time on this.

[TimG]

Next we're going to need a vote per post ratio ranking of posters. Then rankings weighted by forum area. Then rankings based only upon recent posts for the reformed posters. Then...

[mgoetze]

TimG, on 2010-December-16, 13:18, said:

Next we're going to need a vote per post ratio ranking of posters.

But only per post made after the switch to the new forum software, right?

[Gerardo]

mgoetze, on 2010-December-16, 13:56, said:

But only per post made after the switch to the new forum software, right?

No. Since the beginning.

[mgoetze]

Gerardo, on 2010-December-16, 14:46, said:

No. Since the beginning.

Does this mean you are seriously planning to implement such a feature? If so, I propose that many other things would be more useful, e.g. the ability to sort the member list by reputation.