To Bid or not to Bid Nice spots
#41
Posted 2010-December-08, 03:23
I think we still get to slam after the conservative route I suggested (pass and bid only 2D). I think the hand should still splinter. Give partner a disappointing Kxxx x Kxxxx Kxx and 4D still makes.
#42
Posted 2010-December-08, 03:55
![B)](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif)
#43
Posted 2010-December-08, 04:19
Free, on 2010-December-08, 03:55, said:
![B)](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif)
Technically only 4♠
top spade, club and a heart ruff
although at MPs it is much harder to underlead the ♣ AK
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#44
Posted 2010-December-08, 04:48
straube, on 2010-December-08, 03:23, said:
I think we still get to slam after the conservative route I suggested (pass and bid only 2D). I think the hand should still splinter. Give partner a disappointing Kxxx x Kxxxx Kxx and 4D still makes.
I think u would play nothing but 2♦ if you passed 1♠ and bid only 2 ♦
![:D](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#45
Posted 2010-December-08, 05:33
George Carlin
#46
Posted 2010-December-08, 08:24
Nearly switch North with West in the full deal revealed.
#47
Posted 2010-December-09, 08:50
My agreement is VUL Unu2NT claims little more
than fit makes this our hand.
We don't eagerly show weakness!
My agreement includes deviations for 4-5 Unu2NT
especially to warn off the other major.
I can see where you project your agreements
into this discussion to find this Unu2NT is wrong.
MY agreement is well-discussed for how strong VUL
and what is allowed when missing other major.
Thus, both disciplined to our agreement(Exp) and agreed what is the best (say we) for Unu2NT(Adv).
That is Advanced & Expert.
Do you see this now?
#48
Posted 2010-December-09, 09:05
dake50, on 2010-December-09, 08:50, said:
That is Advanced & Expert.
Do you see this now?
Not really.
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#49
Posted 2010-December-09, 10:23
What do you think and why?
Close minded cannot get this idea of discussion.
I only can think I'm right is a defense mechanism
-- not logical discussion!
#50
Posted 2010-December-09, 10:46
dake50, on 2010-December-09, 10:23, said:
What do you think and why?
Close minded cannot get this idea of discussion.
I only can think I'm right is a defense mechanism
-- not logical discussion!
I'm rather pressed for time.
Free on-line lesson after the 15. dec.
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#51
Posted 2010-December-09, 16:40
dake50, on 2010-December-09, 08:50, said:
My agreement is VUL Unu2NT claims little more
than fit makes this our hand.
We don't eagerly show weakness!
My agreement includes deviations for 4-5 Unu2NT
especially to warn off the other major.
I can see where you project your agreements
into this discussion to find this Unu2NT is wrong.
MY agreement is well-discussed for how strong VUL
and what is allowed when missing other major.
Thus, both disciplined to our agreement(Exp) and agreed what is the best (say we) for Unu2NT(Adv).
That is Advanced & Expert.
Do you see this now?
I think using 2N (even by prior agreement) to show a 5/4 hand that can be either way (5D/4C or 4D/5C)is losing bridge because it shows too much preference for the minors and partner can't even tell which minor to support when he is 3/3.
I personally like a Michaels bid that promises only 4S with 5H (and many people hate that) because it is a lawful bid (very likely to stay at or below our law level) and because partner knows what to do with 3/3. That's a far cry from a 2N that can be 5/4 or 4/5 because we're likely to wind up above our law level (if we find our best fit at all). If you had the agreement that 2N showed 5/5 but you might do it with specifically 4D/5C and a strong hand, then that might win sometimes, but I still wouldn't like it.
Without a 5/5 minor hand, I'd rather bid one of my minors (if suitable) or double (if suitable) or pass.