BBO Discussion Forums: Your call? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Your call?

#1 User is offline   NickRW 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,951
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sussex, England

Posted 2010-October-30, 15:17

You hold something like:

S Q964
H Q94
D Q8
C AQ73

Partner deals and opens 2 weak at r/r, pass from righty. What do you do? Why? I'll say why I'm asking after I get a few answers.

Nick

Oh - I should add, MPs, reasonable field, poor opps - you're standing in for a pair that went home in disgust at how badly they were doing in a Swiss pairs.
"Pass is your friend" - my brother in law - who likes to bid a lot.
0

#2 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-October-30, 15:25

The form of scoring and the kind of event would have an influence.

At MP I would often bid 3 to extend the preempt, at IMPs I'm more likely to pass.
0

#3 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-October-30, 15:25

Might bounce to 3 to inhibit a balamce but NOT with those spades, not at these colours and not against weakish opponents.

I pass
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#4 User is offline   NickRW 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,951
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sussex, England

Posted 2010-October-30, 15:37

Well, the 2 replies I've got sort of sum it up. I decided at the table to try 3 - passed out - partner duly brought home 9 tricks as I expected - which was a pretty darned poor result - most pairs sitting the other way got too high for -200 or more. Partner thought I was right to do as I did, but in hind sight I think I have a little too much and bidding inhibited the opps from competing.
"Pass is your friend" - my brother in law - who likes to bid a lot.
0

#5 User is offline   mikestar13 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 648
  • Joined: 2010-October-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Bernardino, CA USA

Posted 2010-October-30, 17:48

View PostNickRW, on 2010-October-30, 15:37, said:

Well, the 2 replies I've got sort of sum it up. I decided at the table to try 3 - passed out - partner duly brought home 9 tricks as I expected - which was a pretty darned poor result - most pairs sitting the other way got too high for -200 or more. Partner thought I was right to do as I did, but in hind sight I think I have a little too much and bidding inhibited the opps from competing.


The LOTT bid is 3, but I would pass with good defense and poor offense. I'd think opponents getting too high is likely on this hand.
0

#6 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,738
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2010-October-30, 22:42

With a weak NT hand it is often right to pass over a weak 2, especially with 4 cards in the other major.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#7 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-October-31, 04:01

Against most opponents, I think 3 is automatic at any form of scoring. If you want them to get too high, by far the best way to do that is to take away all their invtational sequences - people who have to guess tend to go high rather than low. Pass leaves them with Lebensohl, invitational raises of a 2 overcall, three-level overcalls in the minors, etc. Bidding 3 reduces them to just two bids at the three-level, with no invitational sequences at all.

Pass also makes any later competitve decisions harder for you and easier for them. If you pass and they get to 2 or 3, you will then have to guess whether to bid 3. If you do compete to 3, the opponents will know quite a lot about their combined assets, so if you're wrong they're quite likely to double you.

Havng said that, this argument might fall down when you're playing against very weak opponents - if they're so bad that they can't make use of the extra space and information, there's no harm in letting them have it.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#8 User is offline   NickRW 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,951
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sussex, England

Posted 2010-October-31, 09:11

View Postgnasher, on 2010-October-31, 04:01, said:

Havng said that, this argument might fall down when you're playing against very weak opponents.


Well, to be fair, I don't know the actual strength of the opps - I'd never met them before. It was a county organised swiss with a few well known names in the room - and the teams on the Sunday green pointed and won last year by some geezers called Robson, Mahmood and company - so the field must be presumed to be at least reasonable. However we were cut in on table 22 out of circa 30 or so for rounds 5/6/7 after responding to a call from an anxious organiser - so one has to presume that opps are weak compared to the field as a whole - but probably good by normal club standards.
"Pass is your friend" - my brother in law - who likes to bid a lot.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users