Page 1 of 1
how2 force after opening 1C system issue
#1
Posted 2010-October-17, 23:15
The bidding went 1C-1H (opps silent). What's my FORCING rebid? If I had opened a different suit, I could always manufacture a jump shift in a lower non existent suit. My hand was
x, Axx, K, AKJT9873
Partner's response was in the suit I most wanted to hear; I had visions of slam, but no way to explore.
My idea would have been to reverse (2D) then bid 3C or 4C, but I was afraid my partner would take a preference to diamonds.
Finally, I wound up with the practical game force bid of 5C
How do you bid this?
x, Axx, K, AKJT9873
Partner's response was in the suit I most wanted to hear; I had visions of slam, but no way to explore.
My idea would have been to reverse (2D) then bid 3C or 4C, but I was afraid my partner would take a preference to diamonds.
Finally, I wound up with the practical game force bid of 5C
How do you bid this?
#2
Posted 2010-October-17, 23:58
Hi,
Withouth special agreements, 4C would be your best bet,
although a rebid of 4 of openers suit is quite often played
as showing support for responders suit (+ a good suit).
The alternative is a nonforcing 3C, responder will respond
with 8HCP, so although he could pass the likelihood is low.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Withouth special agreements, 4C would be your best bet,
although a rebid of 4 of openers suit is quite often played
as showing support for responders suit (+ a good suit).
The alternative is a nonforcing 3C, responder will respond
with 8HCP, so although he could pass the likelihood is low.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#3
Posted 2010-October-18, 01:34
Without a tool, this is called the hand of death for a reason.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#4
Posted 2010-October-18, 02:28
2NT is forcing for me, however I agree with Uwe.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#5
Posted 2010-October-18, 02:42
You don't have a forcing rebid showing a single-suiter. You can rebid 3NT with shortness in partner's suit, but with this hand you have to make an underbid of 3♣ or invent a new suit, rebidding 2♠ or 2♦.
2NT is forcing to some, and even if it isn't forcing it shows a little more than 3♣ does. But you will need some agreements about how to show this hand type after a 2NT rebid, as in "standard" methods 2NT shows a balanced hand.
2NT is forcing to some, and even if it isn't forcing it shows a little more than 3♣ does. But you will need some agreements about how to show this hand type after a 2NT rebid, as in "standard" methods 2NT shows a balanced hand.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#7
Posted 2010-October-18, 03:45
Btw with this hand I wouldn't be too worried about 3♣ getting passed out. If p is broke then one of the opps would have been able to bid something.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#8
Posted 2010-October-18, 04:17
change to precision or polish ♣.
alternatively, just do something and rest assured that these hands are pretty rare.
alternatively, just do something and rest assured that these hands are pretty rare.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#9
Posted 2010-October-18, 05:22
gwnn, on Oct 18 2010, 05:17 AM, said:
change to precision or polish ♣.
alternatively, just do something and rest assured that these hands are pretty rare.
alternatively, just do something and rest assured that these hands are pretty rare.
A third alternative is to add some convention that can handle such "hands of death". You can play gazzilli, which in this case means 2♦ is artificial and forcing, or include such a hand into a transfer-Walsh structure, where you gain a rebid compared to natural, due to the transfer. After minor openings, the latter is my preference (by opening 1♣ with all 18-19 balanced hands, you gain a rebid after 1♦ opening as well).
#10
Posted 2010-October-18, 05:24
oh yes forgot about that one.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#11
Posted 2010-October-18, 05:58
Recall the system I proposed using Gnasher's "toy" .
http://forums.bridge...pic=41513&st=30
http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?sho...=0entry497328
1 minor open and a 1H response:
1C - 1H
2S! = GF, and my be artificial, unbalanced ( Gnasher's toy )
After 2S! Responder bids 2NT! = asks
Then:
3C! = long Cl, no 3h, no 4s
3D! = 4s, no 3h, 5+c
3H! = 3h, no 4s, 5+c
3S! = 4s and 3h
1C - 1H
2S! - 2NT!
3H! = 3h, no 4s, 5+c... sweet !
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Edit: Jerryblu... What was Responder's hand ?
http://forums.bridge...pic=41513&st=30
http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?sho...=0entry497328
1 minor open and a 1H response:
1C - 1H
2S! = GF, and my be artificial, unbalanced ( Gnasher's toy )
After 2S! Responder bids 2NT! = asks
Then:
3C! = long Cl, no 3h, no 4s
3D! = 4s, no 3h, 5+c
3H! = 3h, no 4s, 5+c
3S! = 4s and 3h
1C - 1H
2S! - 2NT!
3H! = 3h, no 4s, 5+c... sweet !
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Edit: Jerryblu... What was Responder's hand ?
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
Page 1 of 1