BBO Discussion Forums: Another slam - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Another slam

#21 User is offline   ONEferBRID 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 835
  • Joined: 2009-May-03

Posted 2010-October-18, 20:03

http://forums.bridge...showtopic=42283

Let's use Straube's Drury :

2C! = limit raise, 3 or 4 cards
2D! =constructive raise, 3 or 4 cards :

♠ QT87
♥ Q83
♦ QJ6
♣ 653

♠ AKJ96
♥ KJ764

♣ AKJ

p - 1S
2D! - 2H = gametry
3S jump - 6S

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Although I think I would rather have the raise structure reversed
to give the weaker raise another gametry bid.
For example, for the 1H open, there would be NO gametry available at the 2-level
with the original structure.
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
0

#22 User is offline   ninja89 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 2009-May-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Auckland NZ

Posted 2010-October-18, 21:35

bid_em_up, on Oct 18 2010, 11:24 AM, said:

If partner is responding 1 on QT87 Q83 QJ6 653 after a 1 opening, I think you have more things to worry about than getting to slam on this particular hand.

(edit: this is stated from a 2/1 or SAYC context, I suppose you could be playing something else where this is normal)

Is this due to the passed hand status and assuming the use of Drury? As an unpassed hand, isn't 1 followed by 2 routine in 2/1 or SAYC, where an immediate raise is more constructive than this garbage? Even as a passed hand without Drury, 1 has some merit. Not sure I like the style, but that's the impression I get from most 2/1 systems.

As for onefer's sequence, 2 looks rich enough even with four card support, let alone the 3 bid which, even if it is just distinguishing the fourth spade, is a bit gutty. Can opener rebid with something a bit more encouraging that just a game-try; what is 3, for instance?
0

#23 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2010-October-18, 21:48

Phil, on Oct 18 2010, 07:39 AM, said:

After 1 - 2 - 3 -

- North really has a 4 call with 2 big cards and a 4th trump. South will move toward slam.

- Even if North pulls back with 3, South cues 4 and North can cue the Q. You should still get to slam as no cue is great news for South.

+1
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#24 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2010-October-18, 22:05

ONEferBRID, on Oct 18 2010, 09:03 PM, said:

Let's abuse Straube's Drury :

2C! = limit raise, 3 or 4 cards
2D! =constructive raise, 3 or 4 cards :

FYP
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users