BBO Discussion Forums: Natural or cuebid - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Natural or cuebid

#1 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2010-October-06, 03:44

Not sure if this is a B/I problem, but I had the following sequence with a very good player that I had not played with before.

Natural or cuebid, in a 2/1 setting:

1 - 2
2 - 2
3 - 4
4
0

#2 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,276
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-October-06, 03:50

Cue.

The Cue should promise a top honor, since it is partners suit, and it is
also a good idea, that the first cue in general showes a honor.
The cue does not deny AK in hearts, p should assume that there is a
heart control, if he needs a heart control.
So the 4S is also kind of natural, ..., sort of.

But there is a 3rd meaning: 4S showes 1KC, lots of players play 4D as
Key Card ask for diamonds, and I would be more worried, that p did
intend 4D as keycard ask.

With kind regards
Marlowe

PS: Having read Han's response - for me 4H would also be a cue, promising
a good suit, a source of tricks, so in the end, it is also a suggestion play there,
but it would be a cue for us. Oh, and we also dont play minorwood.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#3 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-October-06, 04:58

4H would be a suggestion to play there, 4S is a cue.

It doesn't make sense to propose playing in a 4-3 fit at this point. But holding xx AQJ10xx Qxx Qx it would be a shame if you couldn't play hearts anymore.

I think that 4D as keycard ask is a terrible agreement for this reason and others. Also, you should discuss whether 4D denies a club control. If so, 4S should show a club control.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#4 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2010-October-07, 02:01

cue
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#5 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2010-October-07, 08:14

Good. I'm not going crazy then!
0

#6 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2010-October-07, 11:59

Responder has at most two hearts maybe fewer, exactly four spades, and five or more diamonds. Opener has three or fewer spades, 5 hearts and 3 diamonds OR 6+ hearts and 3-4 diamonds. 4S is cuebid. If opener has a soft hand with six or more hearts and only three diamonds, opener could have bid 4H as a suggestion to play. But 4S cannot be a suggestion to play.

Worst case scenario, responder can just have a spade fragment instead of a suit, with concentrated values in spades and diamonds, no heart support, no club stopper, and no six-card diamonds, something like KQx-xx-AQJxx-xxx where no other bid makes sense unless systemically required to bid NT even with one suit wide open [I would not like it].
0

#7 User is offline   ONEferBRID 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 835
  • Joined: 2009-May-03

Posted 2010-October-07, 16:08

I'd like to see the hands.
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
0

#8 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2010-October-08, 08:07

ONEferBRID, on Oct 7 2010, 11:08 PM, said:

I'd like to see the hands.

I'm not 100% sure the hands are useful here, as opener had a very sub-min...

Scoring: MP

0

#9 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,732
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2010-October-08, 09:21

Wow! even I would not open that rubbish. 1H, 3D and 4S all seem to be highly dubious bids.
(-: Zel :-)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users