BBO Discussion Forums: Strange statistical anomaly? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Strange statistical anomaly?

#1 User is offline   daveharty 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 694
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ann Arbor, MI
  • Interests:Bridge, juggling, disc sports, Jane Austen, writing, cosmology, and Mexican food

Posted 2010-October-22, 13:26

Played in a two-session pairs game on Wednesday at the local regional, and it wasn't until after the session was over that I realized I hadn't declared a single hand during the second session. ZERO. Then I looked back at the first session and realized I had only declared four times during the first session. So out of 54 boards I declared a grand total of four times. I am not the world's most aggressive bidder, but I am more aggressive than most. And I held my fair share of high cards, too. For reference, my partner declared a total of 18 times, nine in each session. Anyone else had a game like that recently?
Revised Bridge Personality: 44 43 33 44

Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
0

#2 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2010-October-22, 13:47

It looks like (if you just randomly choose a declarer -- obviously there's asymmetry in 54 boards with respect to dealer and vul, so that will skew things), you'll declare 13.5 hands on average, with a std deviation of sqrt(10.125) ~= 3.18 hands. So declaring 4 or fewer hands or 23 or more hands is about a 3sigma event, which you expect to occur only about 0.27% of the time. Declaring exactly 4 you'd expect to occur in 7 out of 10000 54-bd sessions, or once in every 1429 sessions.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#3 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,221
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2010-October-22, 16:13

View Postwyman, on 2010-October-22, 13:47, said:

It looks like (if you just randomly choose a declarer -- obviously there's asymmetry in 54 boards with respect to dealer and vul, so that will skew things), you'll declare 13.5 hands on average, with a std deviation of sqrt(10.125) ~= 3.18 hands. So declaring 4 or fewer hands or 23 or more hands is about a 3sigma event, which you expect to occur only about 0.27% of the time. Declaring exactly 4 you'd expect to occur in 7 out of 10000 54-bd sessions, or once in every 1429 sessions.

Why use the normal-distribution approximation when the computer can do the (exact) binomial distribution :)

The probability of exactly 4 events out of 54 with p=0.25 is 0.0699%
At most 4 events has probability 0.0896%
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#4 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-October-22, 16:40

the statisticals experts focus on mathematics, yet they fail to understand the real fenomenom lol.

He palyed a session with 0 declarer play from 27, I don't need much math to know it is the most unexpected fenomem of the 3 he mentioned :).
0

#5 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2010-October-22, 21:04

View Posthelene_t, on 2010-October-22, 16:13, said:

Why use the normal-distribution approximation when the computer can do the (exact) binomial distribution :)

The probability of exactly 4 events out of 54 with p=0.25 is 0.0699%
At most 4 events has probability 0.0896%


I thought about this -- sheer laziness is really the answer.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users