blame transfer
#4
Posted 2010-September-28, 11:41
Closer to double (regressive) than to bidding 5N. While I love my shape, and controls, my texture is so bad that I can't commit to slam when partner merely committed to game. I don't think he will play me for less for my forcing pass.
#5
Posted 2010-September-28, 14:04
#6
Posted 2010-September-28, 14:32
#7
Posted 2010-September-28, 14:54
#8
Posted 2010-September-28, 15:29
Don't really care for the 5♠ bid, as that sort of bid is often more tactical than rational.
#9
Posted 2010-September-28, 15:31
mikeh, on Sep 28 2010, 03:54 PM, said:
Agree with this. I'm calling whatever I need to call to end up playing 5♠X.
ahydra
#10
Posted 2010-October-16, 02:53
♥A9xxx
♦AK9x
♣10xxx
(3♠) Dbl (4♠) 4NT
(5♠) ???
With no agreements. I have a nice hand... which appears to have got better with the bidding. Forcing pass seems in order for now.
Interestingly, something I have toyed with... 4NT here as lebensohl-style (with a hand not interested in slam) and 5x as mildy interested. Also playable over (4x) dble (P) 4NT. Any comments?
BR
Viren
#11
Posted 2010-October-16, 18:33
Oh and for the problem, I pass. Hopefully partner knows where I stand.
#12
Posted 2010-October-16, 19:06
If my hearts were headed by the AK and my diamonds by the A I might pass and let X sit since I think there would be a higher chance of 2 hearts cashing than 2 diamonds. Here it's tough... if partner has 5 diamonds they might not both cash...
I really have no clue I bid 5NT since I can see us getting only 800 when we have 1370 and most openers won't bid their preempt twice so 500 won't be a good score against 600 for the other pairs sitting our way.
Edit: oops format not specified so probably not MP. even closer then!
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
#13
Posted 2010-October-16, 19:20
nigel_k, on Sep 28 2010, 04:32 PM, said:
For the non-experts who are reading this thread: what do you bid?
#14
Posted 2010-October-16, 19:31
#15
Posted 2010-October-16, 23:13
Zelandakh, on Oct 16 2010, 07:31 PM, said:
lol
#16
Posted 2010-October-17, 01:35
#17
Posted 2010-October-17, 04:53
♠Axxx
♥KQxxx
♦xxxx
♣-
The right void and everything falling meant 12 tricks avaible in 6♥.
However I Was wondering if after a double at the 3 level vulnerable we were worth a forcing pass. I mean, we are more like in the low end of our range than at the top.
#18
Posted 2010-October-17, 05:41
#19
Posted 2010-October-17, 18:01
hanp, on Oct 17 2010, 06:41 PM, said:
So do I.
#20
Posted 2010-October-17, 20:38
Also i would be in a FP because its preempter who bid 5S and because of the vuln. If it where preemptor partner who bid 5S FP should only apply if R vs W IMO.
ex
(3S)---X----(4S)----???
Surely you want partner to sac if he think the sac is cheap.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."