BBO Discussion Forums: blame transfer - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

blame transfer

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-September-28, 05:03

-
A9xxx
AK9x
10xxx


our side vulnerable

(3)-X-(4)-4NT
(5)
0

#2 User is offline   manudude03 

  • - - A AKQJT9876543
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,614
  • Joined: 2007-October-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-28, 05:04

Blame retransfer 5NT.
Wayne Somerville
0

#3 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2010-September-28, 08:47

pass
0

#4 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,045
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2010-September-28, 11:41

pass....forcing of course.

Closer to double (regressive) than to bidding 5N. While I love my shape, and controls, my texture is so bad that I can't commit to slam when partner merely committed to game. I don't think he will play me for less for my forcing pass.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#5 User is offline   bucky 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 430
  • Joined: 2010-May-18

Posted 2010-September-28, 14:04

Yep, PASS the bucket to partner, let him/her make the last mistake.
 
 
0

#6 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2010-September-28, 14:32

I'm playing slam. The void is huge and the rest isn't terrible since I don't have wastage opposite his short suit.
0

#7 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,045
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2010-September-28, 14:54

Has anyone paid attention to that odd 5 call? He or she may be an idiot and if I don't know them I would assume idiocy until proven otherwise, but any semi-competent opp will have a surprise in store for us by way of a side suit, which suggests that maybe our hand, with no texture, won't survive bad splits unless partner has extras.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#8 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2010-September-28, 15:29

6 for me. Pard asked me for a suit and I prefer this suit.

Don't really care for the 5 bid, as that sort of bid is often more tactical than rational.
0

#9 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2010-September-28, 15:31

mikeh, on Sep 28 2010, 03:54 PM, said:

Has anyone paid attention to that odd 5 call? He or she may be an idiot and if I don't know them I would assume idiocy until proven otherwise, but any semi-competent opp will have a surprise in store for us by way of a side suit, which suggests that maybe our hand, with no texture, won't survive bad splits unless partner has extras.

Agree with this. I'm calling whatever I need to call to end up playing 5X.

ahydra
0

#10 User is offline   Viren169 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 2008-December-13
  • Location:UK

Posted 2010-October-16, 02:53

♠-
♥A9xxx
♦AK9x
♣10xxx

(3♠) Dbl (4♠) 4NT
(5♠) ???

With no agreements. I have a nice hand... which appears to have got better with the bidding. Forcing pass seems in order for now.

Interestingly, something I have toyed with... 4NT here as lebensohl-style (with a hand not interested in slam) and 5x as mildy interested. Also playable over (4x) dble (P) 4NT. Any comments?

BR
Viren
0

#11 User is offline   Flameous 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 475
  • Joined: 2008-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oulu, Finland
  • Interests:How to find out shape below 2NT.

Posted 2010-October-16, 18:33

So you are sacrificing "natural" 4NT bid, showing minors. I think it's too deep cost for some more slam accuracy. As the saying goes, games first. :)

Oh and for the problem, I pass. Hopefully partner knows where I stand.
0

#12 User is offline   kayin801 

  • Modern Day Trebuchet Enthusiast
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 738
  • Joined: 2007-October-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Western Mass.

Posted 2010-October-16, 19:06

Are we going to sit if partner doubles? If yes, then pass, if no, then 5NT, because my hand isn't good enough for passing and then bidding, which is grand slam invitational IMO.

If my hearts were headed by the AK and my diamonds by the A I might pass and let X sit since I think there would be a higher chance of 2 hearts cashing than 2 diamonds. Here it's tough... if partner has 5 diamonds they might not both cash...

I really have no clue :) I bid 5NT since I can see us getting only 800 when we have 1370 and most openers won't bid their preempt twice so 500 won't be a good score against 600 for the other pairs sitting our way.

Edit: oops format not specified so probably not MP. even closer then!
I once yelled at my partner for discarding the 'wrong' card when he was subjected to a squeeze that I allowed by giving the wrong count with too high a card. Now he's allowed to pitch aces when the opponents have the king in the dummy. At trick 2. When he could have followed suit. And blame me.

East4Evil sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
0

#13 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2010-October-16, 19:20

nigel_k, on Sep 28 2010, 04:32 PM, said:

I'm playing slam. The void is huge and the rest isn't terrible since I don't have wastage opposite his short suit.

For the non-experts who are reading this thread: what do you bid?
0

#14 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,703
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2010-October-16, 19:31

This hand seems to be pretty perfect for a double if using inverted forcing passes.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#15 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2010-October-16, 23:13

Zelandakh, on Oct 16 2010, 07:31 PM, said:

This hand seems to be pretty perfect for a double if using inverted forcing passes.

lol
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#16 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2010-October-17, 01:35

4NT is 2 places to play, not minors for me. I am bidding 6D.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#17 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-October-17, 04:53

Partner had on this one

Axxx
KQxxx
xxxx
-

The right void and everything falling meant 12 tricks avaible in 6.

However I Was wondering if after a double at the 3 level vulnerable we were worth a forcing pass. I mean, we are more like in the low end of our range than at the top.
0

#18 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-October-17, 05:41

I think that partner's 4NT is off.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#19 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2010-October-17, 18:01

hanp, on Oct 17 2010, 06:41 PM, said:

I think that partner's 4NT is off.

So do I.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#20 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2010-October-17, 20:38

A bad treatment is that 4Nt followed by 5H is slammish and a direct 5H is to play. A better treatment but dangerous is that 4NT si 2 place to play or not foward going with H and a direct 5H is slammish. (so in that case responder should bid 5H not 4Nt)

Also i would be in a FP because its preempter who bid 5S and because of the vuln. If it where preemptor partner who bid 5S FP should only apply if R vs W IMO.

ex

(3S)---X----(4S)----???

Surely you want partner to sac if he think the sac is cheap.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users