A seriously dumb question
#1
Posted 2010-August-31, 16:28
1♠ - 1NT
2m - 2♥
Now, in a non 2/1 context, this would be a poor hand with long hearts (6+?). Am I crazy in thinking this?
In 2/1 it is should be played as?
#2
Posted 2010-August-31, 16:37
As opener... I'm not too sure what to do about this. But it helps to play BART, lol. Even though I've never played it and may never play it.
#3
Posted 2010-August-31, 16:37
There are players who use 2♦ artificially over 2♣, "Bart" variations, to be able to bid with 5 hearts more freely (one of 2d/2h shows 6+ hearts, opener expected to respect signoff usually, other shows 5 hearts, opener expected to pull with stiffs. 2♦ also used to distinguish between stronger/weaker raises of clubs / spade preferences). This at the cost of being able to bid diamonds naturally. But it's not really a beginner/int treatment.
#4
Posted 2010-August-31, 16:58
If you play 1♠ - 3♥ as invitational, it has a further impact.
If you play 1♠ - 2♥ as old school soft GF, it matters.
And, the above, influences whether or not you want to play 1♠ - 1N - 2m - 3♥ as a splinter.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#5
Posted 2010-August-31, 17:05
Phil, on Aug 31 2010, 03:58 PM, said:
It's really bad to play 3H is a splinter in this auction, because hands with 0-2 spades and 0-1 of a side suit where the opponents aren't bidding anything are very rare. You can play 3H or a 3D jump over clubs as lots of things, but splinter is not effective.
#6
Posted 2010-August-31, 17:41
#7
Posted 2010-August-31, 21:28
jdonn, on Aug 31 2010, 06:41 PM, said:
you have pierced the heart of the matter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76e7c/76e7c83357a8810ac6243165f60c4989ee4e25a1" alt=";)"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#8
Posted 2010-September-01, 00:17
Ant590, on Aug 31 2010, 05:28 PM, said:
1♠ - 1NT
2m - 2♥
Now, in a non 2/1 context, this would be a poor hand with long hearts (6+?). Am I crazy in thinking this?
In 2/1 it is should be played as?
See Jdonn's post.
I just want to add, that the 1NT response may contain several hand types,
the way the auction developed, you know, that p 1NT response was based
on a hand, that would have responded 1NT playing standard, ...,
and because of this the meaning of 2H in the given seq. is also "standard".
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2010-September-01, 04:49
Anyway, this in non-invitational and tends to be a 6-card suit so opener should not panic with a singleton hearts.
Responder's rebid with 10-11 points and five hearts is a weak point in 2/1 if not playing some gadget for it. Responder will usually bid 2NT with those hands. Some people like then, as opener, to cater to it by bidding
1♠-1NT
1m-2NT
3♥*
on a 3-card suit, offering a choice of game. I think it was Fred who said he thought that's a bad idea since it won't find a 3-5 fit very often so on balance it helps the opposition more.
#10
Posted 2010-September-01, 05:36
jdonn, on Aug 31 2010, 06:41 PM, said:
♥
#11
Posted 2010-September-01, 15:31
If playing Bart then this only applies when opener rebids 2♦.