JLOGIC, on Jul 17 2010, 01:35 AM, said:
If there were memory aids allowed, I would just play ultimate club (I think that's the system that won challenge the champs like 10 times in a row so they had to change the format?).
Part of the tournament would then be who has the best documented system. If every bid can be defined then defining the most auctions in the best theoretical manner would be a huge edge. I don't think a good pair would be beatable ever in that format.
Also, IMO, how good a system is includes how hard is it to remember. There are a lot of auctions that can be optimized theoretically imo that aren't because there's a finite amount of memory that people have.
It seems like memory aids would turn it more into a "who has the best documented system, and which system is the best" competition. That kind of competition has merit but it's not what I think of when I think of a bidding competition.
Anyways, hopefully you can understand this point of view, I don't think the intention was ever to exclude you.
IMO allowing vs not allowing memory aids just creates 2 different types of competitions, both of them have merit but they're different, and typically no memory aids are allowed in stuff like this since it's trying to simulate real at-the-table bidding. That's not to say this way is better or worse though, but it's the way I prefer (which is why I voted against memory aids).
Hi Justin:
I think that there is a significant difference between Free and I playing MOSCITO and your adopting Ultimate Club.
The system that Free and I would be using is one that we used to play regularly and had memorized. They reason that we don't currently know the system by rote is not a question of complexity or out ability to memorize a complex system, but rather that we both have jobs that are keeping us too busy to play seriously.
If I viewed this as a real bidding contest then I would agree that these sorts of inequities would be a serious consideration. Then again, if this were a real bidding contest one would hope that there was some way to make sure that folks weren't IMing one another with the hands...
I view this as a rather amusing diversion.
I think that the most important value of the exercise is to see how people value hands and what choices that they make. To a lesser extent, I think that it is interesting to contrast what nag of tricks people have available.
I have no real interest in this event as a contest either between systems or individuals. Indeed, I'd go so far as to say that emphasizing this aspect of the exercise seems like a mistake. (If you turn this into a real contest and egos get involved people will start "cheating")