Forcing?
#1
Posted 2010-July-08, 11:18
1♦-(P)-1♥-(1♠)
3♣
and
1♦-(1♠)-P-(P)
3♣
#2
Posted 2010-July-08, 11:31
#3
Posted 2010-July-08, 11:36
#4
Posted 2010-July-08, 11:58
I can bid 2♣ in both and also double (although in the first one it would probably be 3-card heart support which narrows my possibilities). As for being forcing, I think I agree with jdonn but only because if I REALLY had to force in the second one I might as well cue-bid.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#5
Posted 2010-July-08, 12:05
jdonn, on Jul 8 2010, 12:36 PM, said:
Me too.
#8
Posted 2010-July-08, 12:48
Haha KFay...........
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#9
Posted 2010-July-08, 14:27
jdonn, on Jul 9 2010, 05:36 AM, said:
Agree except that its sometimes hard to know what is standard in these sort of situations.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#10
Posted 2010-July-08, 17:31
Hanoi5, on Jul 8 2010, 12:58 PM, said:
How are they similar? In the first one partner has responded to your non-forcing opening bid, so it is logical to have some forcing bids available. In the second one, partner can still have nothing, 1♦ was not forcing, so it is not logical for any of opener's bids to be forcing.
Anyway agree with first one forcing, second one not.
#11
Posted 2010-July-08, 18:15
#12
Posted 2010-July-09, 06:51
3♣
1♦-(1♠)-P-(P)
3♣
I think the standard interpretation is first forcing 2nd not. How I prefer to play is
another matter entirely.
the two situations are extremely dissimilar and in situation 1 those of you that play
support x are at a disadvantage.
hand 1 NF
the first I would play as strongly invitational --a hand not strong enough to bid 3s (asking for spade stop for 3n) or even 2s (a bid that says nothing about heart support) and wrong distribution for x something similar to
xx x KQJxx AKQxx
hand 2 NF
the second as non forcing and very distributional and weak similar to
void x Axxxxx AQxxxx
bidding 2c in this position should generally be stronger than bidding 3c.
The reason for this is you are backing into an auction where there is significant danger in the form of the opps making a game and at least by preemting with a weak hand you make it harder for either to compete because of the unknown nature of your partners hand.
#16
Posted 2010-July-10, 03:41
whereagles, on Jul 8 2010, 07:40 PM, said:
You use a _jump_ to 2NT as good/bad? What do you do with a strong balanced hand (particularly on the first one)?