don't worry it is not vulnerable
#1
Posted 2010-June-27, 06:28
♥AK94
♦AQJ63
♣6
♠J10975
♥53
♦4
♣AJ753
east dealer nobody vul
- - - - - ps-ps
2♥!-X-ps-4♠
ps-4NT-ps-5♣
ps-7♠-ps-ps
ps
2♥= 5+ hearts 4+ minor weak
LHO is so kind to lead ♠2
EDIT: changed ♣7 to ♣6 so pooltuna is happy
#2
Posted 2010-June-27, 09:09
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#3
Posted 2010-June-27, 12:19
Play as if it could happen.
#4
Posted 2010-June-27, 13:56
dake50, on Jun 27 2010, 06:19 PM, said:
Play as if it could happen.
you don't have the entries for the squeeze I'm afraid, you kill dummy's hearts to get to hand and ruff clubs and pull trumps.
#5
Posted 2010-June-27, 14:45
But the lead doesn't have to be singleton, we are in grand and opponent might as well lead small from doubleton to mislead declarer.
Alternative line is
1. ----
2. ♣ to Ace
3. ♣ ruff
4. ♦ Ace
5. ♦ ruff
6. ♣ ruff
7. ♦ ruff
(Winning if LHO has 2♠ and ♦ Kx or ♦ xxxx )
#6
Posted 2010-June-27, 15:26
#7
Posted 2010-June-28, 03:08
west had
♠x
♥Q10xxx
♦Kxx
♣Qxxx
My father found the winning line at the table (diamond finese diamond ruff and score ♦J without pulling trumps, then cross ruff) for +1510.
It is quite surprising that so far we have played 4 grands making, neither of them cold, but only 3 slams, neither of them making
#8
Posted 2010-June-28, 04:13
George Carlin
#10
Posted 2010-June-28, 11:51
George Carlin
#11
Posted 2010-June-29, 02:53
Fluffy, on Jun 28 2010, 12:33 PM, said:
I think your dad overbid this hand.
#12
Posted 2010-June-29, 05:18
hanp, on Jun 29 2010, 08:53 AM, said:
Fluffy, on Jun 28 2010, 12:33 PM, said:
I think your dad overbid this hand.
you are overlooking that our live doubles on preempts show the nuts
#13
Posted 2010-June-29, 06:48
Kxxxxx
x
x
JTxxx
ahahah. All white, mind you Anyway, good play by your father, Gonzalo. The diamond finesse is more or less mandatory due to lack of entries.
#14
Posted 2010-June-29, 06:53
whereagles, on Jun 29 2010, 07:48 AM, said:
I don't understand this comment. Why is this mandatory and not wclass_'s line?