Methods after Notrump Overcall
#1
Posted 2010-June-20, 20:59
(1♥)-1NT-(Pass)-???
Do people play 2♦ "transfer to hearts" here?
It also seems like you could take advantage of the opponent bid to work out slightly better methods. I'm curious whether any serious partnerships have agreements about these situations which are better/more detailed than "systems on."
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#2
Posted 2010-June-20, 21:17
so.... 2s = nat, week
2H = spades inv (to accept opener bids 3H)
2C/D = nat, week
2nt = inivtitational, may have 4 spades
you might choose to replace 2C with a staymanesque invitational hand with 4 spades so that a hand which would reject a balanced invite might still get to 4S.
#3
Posted 2010-June-20, 21:26
#4
Posted 2010-June-20, 21:37
#5
Posted 2010-June-21, 01:28
We used to play system on, it worked.
Now we use transfer in their major suit as inv. strength for the other major,
it would have come up once.
The French / German Standard System uses transfer in their suit as stayman,
this also seems to be a sensible idea.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2010-June-21, 18:04
2♣=diamonds, 2♦=4♠ inv+ (stayman), 2♥=spades, 2♠=clubs
After (2♠)-2NT:
3♣=diamonds, 3♦=hearts, 3♥=4♥ game-going (stayman), 3♠=clubs
This seems fairly simple and allows you to sign off in diamonds.
Having direct signoffs might be even better (puts opener on lead) but it seems awkward to do this and still find all your major suit fits.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#7
Posted 2010-June-22, 02:26
1♥ 1NT pass 2♦
2♦ = are you joking about the stopper? Responses are
2♥ = half stopper (that includes ♥xxxx)
2NT = full stopper
else = nat and "yes, that was a joker stopper"
#9
Posted 2010-June-22, 04:48
#10
Posted 2010-June-22, 07:19
No reason to play transfers as you want the opening bidder on lead.
#11
Posted 2010-June-22, 08:15
#12
Posted 2010-June-22, 08:29
ArtK78, on Jun 22 2010, 07:19 AM, said:
There are more to transfers than merely engineering who becomes declarer.
#13
Posted 2010-June-22, 08:55
One thing that could be useful is to use 2D as "bid NT if your have the hearts STUFFED cuz I'm short; if not let's find a suit"
I am going to listen and look.
#14
Posted 2010-June-22, 12:15
#15
Posted 2010-June-22, 15:04
aguahombre, on Jun 22 2010, 09:29 AM, said:
ArtK78, on Jun 22 2010, 07:19 AM, said:
There are more to transfers than merely engineering who becomes declarer.
Yes, but 2-way Stayman can handle everything that you need quite nicely.
#16
Posted 2010-June-22, 17:17
Oops I've said too much.
#17
Posted 2010-June-22, 22:47
suits below the opener suits are nat
suits from the opps suit are natural
example 1h-1Nt-p
2d is nat
2h/2s transfer
#18
Posted 2010-June-23, 07:00
We just have on exception: After (1♣) 1NT (pass) system is on...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...