2010 US Open Trials glen-style system breakdown
#21
Posted 2010-June-17, 13:28
bed
#23
Posted 2010-June-18, 07:29
gnasher, on Jun 17 2010, 04:33 PM, said:
many thanks for very interesting on US trials sytems for World championships,
but by Gnasher (hi) (and hi all)
** Nobody outside France thinks that Standard French is any good, ** => am on the same railway thinking.
** but their top players don't seem to have any difficulty ** => really any ?
** with getting good results playing it. ** => am very affraid for Ostend : like in South Afrika with soccer ))
friendly all (French sys is the most difficult to play, in the universe ))
#24
Posted 2010-June-18, 08:32
Have you even played all the systems on this planet to be able to judge?
bed
#25
Posted 2010-June-18, 09:16
bab9, on Jun 17 2010, 03:23 AM, said:
Nothing, except it takes away one useful opening from your system. And the only advantages that it offers are easily and more ellegantly compensated by playing the 1♥-1♠ Kaplan's inversion.
#26
Posted 2010-June-18, 09:31
bhtf, on Jun 18 2010, 08:29 AM, said:
Hmm...clearly, you haven't played the system that that uses a modulo function of random Vogon poetry to define what the next bid should be ...
#27
Posted 2010-June-18, 09:36
George Carlin
#28
Posted 2010-June-18, 11:35
bhtf, on Jun 18 2010, 08:29 AM, said:
gnasher, on Jun 17 2010, 04:33 PM, said:
many thanks for very interesting on US trials sytems for World championships,
but by Gnasher (hi) (and hi all)
** Nobody outside France thinks that Standard French is any good, ** => am on the same railway thinking.
** but their top players don't seem to have any difficulty ** => really any ?
** with getting good results playing it. ** => am very affraid for Ostend : like in South Afrika with soccer ))
friendly all (French sys is the most difficult to play, in the universe ))
Flannery or not.., French or Acol or Stand Am, or Precison...
Here is a dirty little secret: the decision what system/conventions (except in competitive bidding of course) you will going to play matters very little, perhaps a tad more than does your partner have a bad breath, as long as you are on the same page and manage to avoid misunderstandings. If I have a time I can easily find quotes from many great players and theorist saying pretty much the same thing.
Still, so why are we spending so much time tinkering with system instead of say studying "More Killing Defence" by Kelsey or doing some other things that would help our game way more? Because it is easier and way more fun, thats why!
#29
Posted 2010-June-18, 11:42
And I beleive French std is a very sound system and easy to play, talking about bridge, it is just like my mother tongue , so probably biased a little.
#30
Posted 2010-June-18, 12:03
#31
Posted 2010-June-18, 12:10
George Carlin
#32
Posted 2010-June-18, 13:00
the most feature of French stdt is 2D FG.
not really very good, no ? but u can think otherwise ))
sry but i "hate" it. (as french player i know a little)
friendly, Al