Support DBL, 2 or 3 card?
#1
Posted 2010-June-13, 03:42
DBL
You play support DBL's.
Is DBL a 3c♠ or a good 2c♠?
#2
Posted 2010-June-13, 03:54
George Carlin
#5
Posted 2010-June-13, 04:35
kgr, on Jun 13 2010, 05:17 AM, said:
yep./ but not a 3s bid.
#6
Posted 2010-June-13, 04:40
kgr, on Jun 13 2010, 10:17 AM, said:
yes.
George Carlin
#7
Posted 2010-June-13, 04:50
kgr, on Jun 13 2010, 04:42 AM, said:
DBL
You play support DBL's.
Is DBL a 3c♠ or a good 2c♠?
Did 1♠ show 4+ , or 5+ cards?
If you play 4+ , support double shows 3 cards.
If you play 5+, you can still play that double shows 3 card raise (and 2♠ shows 4 card raise), or you can play (my preference) that double is "takeout without ♠ support" , normally 2245 or similar.
#8
Posted 2010-June-13, 05:01
mich-b, on Jun 13 2010, 05:50 AM, said:
kgr, on Jun 13 2010, 04:42 AM, said:
DBL
You play support DBL's.
Is DBL a 3c♠ or a good 2c♠?
Did 1♠ show 4+ , or 5+ cards?
If you play 4+ , support double shows 3 cards.
If you play 5+, you can still play that double shows 3 card raise (and 2♠ shows 4 card raise), or you can play (my preference) that double is "takeout without ♠ support" , normally 2245 or similar.
1s shows 5
x shows 3...
easy...
geez you guys make all bidding so confusing no one knows nothing...
#9
Posted 2010-June-13, 05:59
mich-b, on Jun 13 2010, 11:50 AM, said:
Another option is Doorknob Five Two, described by Danny Kleinmann in the Bridge World some years ago, where double shows exactly 2 spades and 5+ clubs.
#10
Posted 2010-June-13, 06:16
I always thought that standard support DBL shows almost a fit: 3c if partner promised only 4+ and 2c if partner promised 5+.
Seems I was completely wrong about that 2c.
....I'll have to verify what my partners standard is.
Edit: I was going to send a mail to my partner, but it seems that we cannot have this situation. e.g: 1C-(1D)-1H = 4+Spade; and 1D-(1H)-DBL = 4+Spade and 1D-(1H)-1S = less then 4c Spade.
..Maybe one??:
1C-(1S)-2D!-(DBL)
2D=Transfer.
=> RDBL=3cH and 2H=4cH? I'm not even sure that support DBL is best here.
#11
Posted 2010-June-13, 08:07
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#12
Posted 2010-June-13, 12:45
#13
Posted 2010-June-13, 14:15
bed
#14
Posted 2010-June-16, 12:46
If partner shows 4 spades, with 3 I support double with a bit better than minimum hand, say a 14 count.
(Actually in most partnerships if I open 1♣ and don't repeat the suit I guarantee 2 spades, but the above comments apply always.)
It seems to me that when you are in a competitive situation you should describe the length of the fit. It helps partner decide what to do.
1♣ 1♥ 1♠ 3♥ then opposite 5 cards support double with 3 unless minimum and bid 3♠ with 4.
1♣ 1♠ 2♥ 2♠ then support double with a non-minimum 2 and bid 3♥ with 3. The principle being that with an 8 card fit I bid 2 of our suit over their 2, or 3 over 2 if we rank lower than theirs, while a support double shows one less than that required to bid the suit. A support double also "guarantees" half the points in the pack so that a double is invited if they go too high.
#15
Posted 2010-June-17, 08:34
fromageGB, on Jun 16 2010, 01:46 PM, said:
I don't know of anybody who would agree with that.
You are free to make whatever agreements you want to, but if you play with a good pickup partner, expect support doubles to apply through "two of our major" and in situations where support double applies, Dbl = 3-card, Pass = 2 or less cards, and raise = 4 cards. If you have differing agreements as to level, they are not necessarily worse or better, just different.
IMO the combined length of our side trump suit is a crucial factor in deciding how high we might want to go, and in slam decisions it is often the deciding factor whether slam makes or not, depending if we have 9-card or 8-card fit. Which is why - in my experiencce - it is useful to have support double on even when partner has promised 5. And also in my experience - is the way most play support doubles.
#16
Posted 2010-June-17, 11:53
#17
Posted 2010-June-17, 11:56