BBO Discussion Forums: Duck or not - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Duck or not

Poll: Duck or not? (11 member(s) have cast votes)

Duck or not?

  1. Duck (8 votes [72.73%])

    Percentage of vote: 72.73%

  2. Goose (3 votes [27.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 27.27%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2010-June-14, 04:08

This is a hand I played about a year ago. The thread about ducking Aces reminded me of this one, where my RHO gave the show away.

You are east.

The bidding went:
1NT - Dbl - 2 - pass
pass - pass
(Dbl showed a strong hand, 2 was signoff)

Partner leads the 5 (3th/5th) and you get the following view:
Scoring: MP


Declarer thinks for a few minutes, and finally plays A (you play the Q - do you agree?).

Now declarer plays 8 from dummy. You had a lot of time to think about the hand at trick 1, but were you prepared for this? Do you duck or do you play the K?

At the table I was South. Although my RHO is one of the better players in Belgium, he wasn't prepared for the 8. It took him several minutes to decide what to do. I'll give the full hand later.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#2 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-June-14, 06:36

In accordance with my policy as stated in the other thread, I duck, because I have not a good enough reason to go up. I am not too worried about declarer holding Q bare, since that would give partner 5 and he might have found a 2 call over 2.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2010-June-14, 09:14

I think this is a tough problem at MPs. At IMPs, rising appears to give away the contract; conceding 2 + 3 + 2 + 1.

I agree with the Q. In general, I believe we should be showing as many of our cards to declarer after our penalty x.

The lead appears to be from four, although 98765(x) are theoretically possible. Therefore, I'll put declarer on 5=3 in the reds.

Since some of my earlier posts haven't been clear to some, I will state the obvious and say that if we rise with the K and declarer has squadoosh in the suit, we will look very bad.

If declarer has Qx, ducking doesn't cost, since we are just trading a club trick for a spade trick. In fact, if declarer has Qx/Qxx, I've been grosvenored with him playing a spade instead of a club. However, I'm not inclined to put declarer on either Qx Kxxxx xxx Qxx / Qxx Kxxxx xxx Qx because I think these hands sit for 1N x'd.

With 3-2 in the blacks, the spade trick isn't going anywhere.

Also, unlike the Ace ducks mentioned earlier, I'm not that worried about giving away the show with this duck so I will take all of the time I need, even though declarer will know I don't have KQ.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#4 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2010-June-15, 04:12

I fail to see any immediate problem, so I would defend this purely by instinct, which is to duck smoothly.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users