Opener's Rebid-- Part 1 Part 2 will show Responder's hand
#21
Posted 2010-May-30, 05:33
2NT.... is a very close 2nd.... eventho it is non-forcing( unless you play it as forcing ).
3D-jump .....has to be the worst... as it is "more non-forcing".... and when you see Responder's hand ( below ), he now has a forcing problem of his own.
Part 2
Here is Responder's hand.
Go for it with your favorite auction ( you can even start with a 2NT open if you so desire ).
6H+1 scores worst.
6NT+1 ...better.
7NT scores a bunch.
Responder
A J
K Q 9 x x x x
Q x
Q x
#22
Posted 2010-May-30, 05:46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d939/7d939770e447b147fd6d342b81fef775dd3a5660" alt=":)"
George Carlin
#23
Posted 2010-May-30, 06:56
#24
Posted 2010-May-30, 07:08
It has nothing to do with initial choice of openers/rebids imo.
I am pretty sure 2 lols at my club would bid this grand without any problems (but again, lols at my club would be in GF auction way below 2NT).
#26
Posted 2010-May-30, 07:35
dealmegold, on May 30 2010, 01:31 PM, said:
If p had opened 2NT it would be a hell of a lot easier.
Unless partner has AK tight in a minor, you have 0 losers.
George Carlin
#27
Posted 2010-May-30, 07:37
gwnn, on May 30 2010, 08:35 AM, said:
dealmegold, on May 30 2010, 01:31 PM, said:
If p had opened 2NT it would be a hell of a lot easier.
Unless partner has AK tight in a minor, you have 0 losers.
yup, see edit
#28
Posted 2010-May-30, 07:53
George Carlin
#29
Posted 2010-May-31, 09:16
#30
Posted 2010-May-31, 16:30
cherdanno, on May 30 2010, 12:56 AM, said:
Typical. Since when would I rebid 2♣ on a hand this good?
Opening or rebidding 2NT are fine (well, mostly just opening). 3♣ is way better than 3♦ but that's moot since we all know 3♦ is awful.
This would not be a hard hand to bid after a 2NT opening. Or after anything opener does really.
#31
Posted 2010-May-31, 16:54
#32
Posted 2010-May-31, 17:08
bed