no but I think 1NT is not worse than 2♦
I thought it was obvious!
#42
Posted 2010-May-10, 04:54
To CSGibson,
Is 3H -1 overcompeted verses 3m=, +1, +2? Vul 100 vs 110, 130, 150/400/600.
So 3H -2 is overcompeting? Vul 200 vs 110, 130, 150/400/600.
This is my alluded 4H-2 may lose to 3m=/+1 or they overbid 5m-1 set we no longer get.
Is 3H -1 overcompeted verses 3m=, +1, +2? Vul 100 vs 110, 130, 150/400/600.
So 3H -2 is overcompeting? Vul 200 vs 110, 130, 150/400/600.
This is my alluded 4H-2 may lose to 3m=/+1 or they overbid 5m-1 set we no longer get.
#43
Posted 2010-May-10, 05:45
gwnn, on May 10 2010, 11:19 AM, said:
no but I think 1NT is not worse than 2♦
1NT is a classic psyche, opps are more likely to read it than they are to read 2♦. Then again, so is partner.
Oh well, maybe we don't psyche at this vulnerability. I would give 0 to both options.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#44
Posted 2010-May-10, 06:03
2♥, for the reasons Nigel gave above.
No comments about the psyche, I am no flair player.
No comments about the psyche, I am no flair player.
SCBA National TD, EBU Club TD
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.