BBO Discussion Forums: I thought it was obvious! - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

I thought it was obvious!

#1 User is offline   Little Kid 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 323
  • Joined: 2008-May-26
  • Location:London
  • Interests:Genetic Engineering, Squash, Languages, Travelling, Table Tennis, Movies, Judo, Swimming, Scuba Diving, Climbing...

Posted 2010-May-07, 15:42

Scoring: IMP

(Pass)-1-(1)-?

Veni, vidi, proficisci
0

#2 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-May-07, 15:44

It is obvious. Raise!
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#3 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,176
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2010-May-07, 15:50

I disagree...it ain't obvious, at least not to me.

I pass.

LHO almost certainly isn't raising spades, and if partner can't reopen, I'm probably very happy. If he does reopen, I can bid hearts.

As for an immediate raise...this is not a hand on which I would like to hear partner jump to game or make a gametry....my spades are so bad that I can't stop the tap if there is one.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#4 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-May-07, 15:54

Why don't you want partner to bid game? I would expect it to make, and in many cases a game we would miss if I pass and he reopens and I simply go to hearts.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#5 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2010-May-07, 16:02

Agree - partner is almost certainly reopening and we can comfortably bid 2.

And if partner sits with Hxx of spades? I'm happy.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#6 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-May-07, 16:11

I have an ace and 3 card support

and xxxxx in RHO's suit

weeeeeeeeee

raising feels good!!

... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#7 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2010-May-07, 16:48

2.
Most people I know don't like this style and I would have to pass playing with them. I think raising with such hands is winning strategy though.
0

#8 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2010-May-07, 17:35

:)
Kevin Fay
0

#9 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2010-May-07, 17:36

I learn towards pass, with 10 losers and the knowledge the spade ruffs are hitting the long hand, but I certainly wouldn't call raising obviously wrong.
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-May-07, 17:37

wrong vulnerability, but I prefer to bid 3 than 2 with this crap hand, partner will know where we live better. With this vulnerability pass.
0

#11 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2010-May-07, 18:16

Little Kid, on May 7 2010, 04:42 PM, said:

Scoring: IMP

(Pass)-1-(1)-?

IMO 2 = 10, _P = 7, 2 = 4, 2 = 2.
In Partnershp Bidding at Bridge, Robson and Segal advise you to try to pre-empt opponents when you have length in their bid suit but they are likely to have a fit in another suit.
0

#12 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2010-May-07, 18:23

2H, a mild overbid to possibly give LHO a problem or shut out their minor.
0

#13 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2010-May-07, 18:51

I am a raiser.

Good things could happen (we make game or shut out the opponents) or bad things could happen (we get too high) but I don't think we should be overthinking this sort of hand, just raise because we have support and some values.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#14 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-May-07, 20:11

2
OK
bed
0

#15 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2010-May-07, 23:36

2. I have no wastage opposite partner's expected shortness, the ace is a good card, and I have some distribution even. This is not a problem to me.
Chris Gibson
0

#16 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2010-May-07, 23:42

Obvious 2.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

#17 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2010-May-08, 04:31

I was good enough to raise to 2 had RHO passed so nothing has changed that. An Ace is better than a KJ or QQ, and I don't even have a 4333 so I have nothing to be ashamed about.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#18 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2010-May-08, 08:59

Agree nigel.
Don't just analyze our hand -quite weak raise, but include opponents finding minor fit!
Essentially two ways to win: H-fit found + their minor missed.
Loose only if overbid 4H. Or rarely we set 5m now not found.
0

#19 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2010-May-08, 09:22

Both sides of the debate give good reasoning. "Obvious" in the title, and "obvious" in anyone's contribution seems inappropriate. It is a damn good question, worthy of this forum.

I agree with all the arguments (except for 3H). "Obviously", whichever I choose will work out badly.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#20 User is offline   Little Kid 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 323
  • Joined: 2008-May-26
  • Location:London
  • Interests:Genetic Engineering, Squash, Languages, Travelling, Table Tennis, Movies, Judo, Swimming, Scuba Diving, Climbing...

Posted 2010-May-08, 11:10

I thought an ace and support made 2 automatic but maybe it is not as clear as I expected.
Veni, vidi, proficisci
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users