BBO Discussion Forums: Nasty split - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Nasty split

#1 User is offline   obscurans 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 2009-May-07

Posted 2010-April-23, 21:35

At a sectional today:
Scoring: MP

Pass - Pass - 1 - Pass
1NT - Pass - 2 - Pass
3 - Pass - 4 - AP
Sitting South, got a "friendly" lead; when the 50 struck I knew I was down. Took the K, led another heart to dummy (W took the Q), got a spade ruffed. Next, rammed the rest of the spades through, overruffing twice, ruffing back to hand. Escaped for -1, low (not bottom) score.

Just wondering if I had my 4 bid, and was there any better way at this hand. Double dummy says 2 or 3 limit.
0

#2 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2010-April-24, 01:11

with 3-2 hearts you rate to make 4 or 5 a decent chunk of the time, so there's nothing ostensibly wrong with the contract.

You also have a 6-4 with most of the high card points in the suits, that's a very good hand, and worth bidding game IMO. Heck, catch partner with as little as Kx and Qxxx, and you have play for game.
Chris Gibson
0

#3 User is offline   cloa513 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,529
  • Joined: 2008-December-02

Posted 2010-April-24, 02:05

You were also unlucky that West didn`t double like most players would to alert you to the risk.
0

#4 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-April-24, 11:36

cloa513, on Apr 24 2010, 02:05 AM, said:

You were also unlucky that West didn`t double like most players would to alert you to the risk.

lol?

everything about this hand was normal except the terrible defense and W not doubling after an invitational auction.
OK
bed
0

#5 User is offline   obscurans 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 2009-May-07

Posted 2010-April-24, 13:19

Not sure what the defence should be doing: leading into my suit is probably bad, and trumps might work; once I see the 5-0 leading through W lets me cover their card exactly, so taking the Q might not be so bad (I would draw 3 and ruff once in dummy). Once I'm running the spades, underruffing is the best chance at locking me in the dummy.

An X would make me run to spades unsupported, I hold 6 here and even if there is a stack, it's now onside.
0

#6 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2010-April-24, 14:22

deleted

This post has been edited by Bbradley62: 2010-April-24, 14:24

0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users