After
1♥ - 1♠
2♣
does anyone play xyz-like followups:
2♦ = puppet to 2♥, to play or for invite
2♥ = artificial GF
2♠+ = ?
Any significant advantages or disadvantages over regular 4SF?
Page 1 of 1
1H 1S 2C
#2
Posted 2010-April-14, 18:02
Recently I saw following solution:
2♦ - puppet to 2♥,sign off in ♥ or ♠ or any GF
2♥/♠/NT/3♣ - invite
Pawel
2♦ - puppet to 2♥,sign off in ♥ or ♠ or any GF
2♥/♠/NT/3♣ - invite
Pawel
#3
Posted 2010-April-16, 23:24
[14] Special 3rd and 4th suit auctions
- 1H-1S-2C-2D = Weak preference to 2H or art game force
- 1H-1S-2C-2H = Constructive preference
from one of Fred's old convention cards. IMO it's very useful to be able to show 2 different kinds of preferences in either a natural or strong club system (where "strong preference" in a strong club system can be as much as 12-13 depending on how light you open).
- 1H-1S-2C-2D = Weak preference to 2H or art game force
- 1H-1S-2C-2H = Constructive preference
from one of Fred's old convention cards. IMO it's very useful to be able to show 2 different kinds of preferences in either a natural or strong club system (where "strong preference" in a strong club system can be as much as 12-13 depending on how light you open).
#4
Posted 2010-April-17, 02:33
rogerclee, on Apr 17 2010, 12:24 AM, said:
IMO it's very useful to be able to show 2 different kinds of preferences in either a natural or strong club system (where "strong preference" in a strong club system can be as much as 12-13 depending on how light you open).
Agreed. Me and my partner played something like this in Bart situations, i.e.
1♠-1N(f)-2♣
2♠ weaker 3 card limit raise
3♠ stronger 3 card limit raise
2♦ artificial...2♠ weak preference
2N stronger non-fitting invite
Certainly one could prioritize the 2 different preference ranges instead of keeping more of limit raises low.
Page 1 of 1