BBO Discussion Forums: Frank Stewart's ACBL column - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Frank Stewart's ACBL column What do you open with 4-4 in the minors?

#21 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,433
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2010-April-05, 22:40

I'm not sure what the advantage is to opening 1 with 4-4 in the minors. Assuming that you still open 1 with 4/2-3, it's not like your 1 opening promises five or an unbalanced hand or anything, so it doesn't seem like you gain a lot from the negative inferences on the 1 open.

There are a lot of advantages to opening 1 though. These include high level negative double auctions as previously discussed, but also that partner can raise 1 (which is almost always four) more freely than 1 (which is often three), that 1 has more lead-directional value (again because it's almost always four), and that 1 works better with 2-way nmf (because you can sign off in diamonds after 1-1M-1NT but you can't sign off in clubs at the two-level after 1-1M-1NT).
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#22 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2010-April-05, 22:41

lol gnasher ownz
0

#23 User is offline   barryallen 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 244
  • Joined: 2008-June-03

Posted 2010-April-11, 11:14

Dirk Kuijt, on Apr 4 2010, 08:37 PM, said:

This is from Frank Stewart's column in the ACBL Bulletin, "My Bridge and Yours".  I quote part of his column.


What do you open with 4-4 in the minors?

What I find difficult to see is a proven case for opening 1with 4-4 in the minors? Taking this a stage further, I would have thought there being more of a case to open this with a weak 1NT, rather than 1?
bridge is never always a game of exact, for those times it's all about percentages, partner and the opponents.
0

#24 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2010-April-14, 11:48

barryallen, on Apr 11 2010, 06:14 PM, said:

What I find difficult to see is a proven case for opening 1with 4-4 in the minors? Taking this a stage further, I would have thought there being more of a case to open this with a weak 1NT, rather than 1?

I think that most of Stewart's readers open a strong NT.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#25 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-April-14, 13:19

barryallen, on Apr 11 2010, 12:14 PM, said:

Dirk Kuijt, on Apr 4 2010, 08:37 PM, said:

This is from Frank Stewart's column in the ACBL Bulletin, "My Bridge and Yours".  I quote part of his column.


What do you open with 4-4 in the minors?

What I find difficult to see is a proven case for opening 1with 4-4 in the minors? Taking this a stage further, I would have thought there being more of a case to open this with a weak 1NT, rather than 1?

At least I would say it pays to randomize or not be totally predictable. Most often partner won't care much which you have opened, but there are advantages to lead direction, lead deflection, and simply making your hand harder to count if they play it.

Also many people have what they consider a much better system (transfer responses for example, though there are simpler examples too) over 1 than 1.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users