BBO Discussion Forums: How many Hearts - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

How many Hearts ACBL 2/1

#1 User is offline   dickiegera 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 570
  • Joined: 2009-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 2010-March-22, 10:56

Dealer holding
Scoring: MP


Should opening bid be 1, 3 , 4 or
something else???
Thank you
0

#2 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-March-22, 10:59

1
OK
bed
0

#3 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-March-22, 12:11

4H, second choice: 3NT gambling.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#4 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2010-March-22, 12:15

4H with most partners. (Kantar 3NT, with my regular p, promising a solid suit, no side ace, at most one side K+Q.)

At favorable this'd be too good and I'd have to open 1H.
0

#5 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2010-March-22, 12:21

Siegmund, on Mar 22 2010, 01:15 PM, said:

4H with most partners. (Kantar 3NT, with my regular p, promising a solid suit, no side ace, at most one side K+Q.)

At favorable this'd be too good and I'd have to open 1H.

I think you have this the wrong way around...

Would love love love to open 4 at favorable.

Dislike opening 4 now because we may get clubbed against air, although I respect players that do because, hey, it sucks when my opps open 4.
Kevin Fay
0

#6 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2010-March-22, 12:34

That's one reason I have Kantar on my card with my reg p, kfay: the solid-major hands, that have more than enough tricks for preempting, I can still describe that way at any vul, and not have our side's constructive bidding harmed much.

The preempts I am a firm believer should never have ranges "more than one trick wide"... and favorable 4H openings look like x KQTxxxx Qxx xx or xx AJ9xxxx xxx x. At equal, as here, I want to actually have 7 tricks, which'll more often be KQJ7+A or AQ7+K.
0

#7 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2010-March-22, 12:36

On a side note...

As long as we're on the subject of what to do with 7-trick hands at favorable (or 8-trick hands with neither side vul)... has anybody ever tried playing a preemptive 5H opening, same as 5C and 5D? There's no need for a 5S preempt -- but if you're trying to deny the opponents a spade fit, and you have so many hearts you'd have an obvious 5H bid over their 4S, maybe it'd be better to do it right away.
0

#8 User is offline   mikegill 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 296
  • Joined: 2006-May-26

Posted 2010-March-22, 14:15

I would tend to open 1 red but 4 white. I think the preemptive value of 4 when we're white outweighs the fact that this hand isn't really a prototypical 4 opening. 2nd seat I might open 1 even if white, and I might open 4 if I were 3rd seat red/red
0

#9 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,298
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-March-22, 15:15

4H.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#10 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2010-March-23, 01:32

I would open 4 .

I would open 1 fav. because this hand is way too strong for 4 then.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#11 User is offline   mich-b 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 584
  • Joined: 2008-November-27

Posted 2010-March-23, 03:18

4 at any vulnerability for me.
0

#12 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2010-March-23, 03:18

obvious 3NT gambling :)
0

#13 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2010-March-23, 03:47

Open 4.

But I like the agreement that gambling 3NT can be any suit.
0

#14 User is offline   effervesce 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 2007-March-28

Posted 2010-March-23, 04:15

4 for me. 2nd choice 3, third 1.
Ming

--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
0

#15 User is offline   y66 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,496
  • Joined: 2006-February-24

Posted 2010-March-23, 07:20

Same as MikeGill for me.
If you lose all hope, you can always find it again -- Richard Ford in The Sportswriter
0

#16 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-March-23, 08:32

the only way to shut out spades is to open 4 so that's what I'd do
0

#17 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2010-March-23, 08:47

Siegmund, on Mar 22 2010, 01:36 PM, said:

On a side note...

As long as we're on the subject of what to do with 7-trick hands at favorable (or 8-trick hands with neither side vul)... has anybody ever tried playing a preemptive 5H opening, same as 5C and 5D? There's no need for a 5S preempt -- but if you're trying to deny the opponents a spade fit, and you have so many hearts you'd have an obvious 5H bid over their 4S, maybe it'd be better to do it right away.

I suppose that one might be able to construct a hand that merits a 5 opening bid, even in first or second seat. For example, at favorable vul:

x KQJTxxxxx xx x

But the chance that you will be able to buy the contract in 4 is significant (even with the popular trend that 4 openings are a transfer to 4 by the opponents). And the danger that a 5 opening is too high for your side when the opponents can't make anything is significantly more than for a 4 opening.

It is not always right for the opponents to bid 4 over your 4, even on a hand like the one I suggested above.

If I opened 5 on this hand and took 10 tricks, with the opponents having no playable contract, I would find it hard to explain my action to my partner and teammates.

The bottom line is that opening 5 rather than 4 will be right on occasion, but it is a very small target to hit, and the downside is significant.
0

#18 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-March-23, 08:56

I learned from Larry Cohen I think that 5M shows a solid hand off the A and K of trump. the name was "the rarest convention you will ever use" was it?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#19 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2010-March-23, 09:01

gwnn, on Mar 23 2010, 09:56 AM, said:

I learned from Larry Cohen I think that 5M shows a solid hand off the A and K of trump. the name was "the rarest convention you will ever use" was it?

That is another point. The traditional meaning of a 5 of a major opening is a hand with 11 playing tricks missing the A and K of trump, i.e.:

A QJT9xxxxxx A A

Or some variant of that with a void.

This hand is even less common than a hand where one might want to open a preemptive 5 of a major.

So, if you want to play that a 5 of a major bid is preemptive, you should discuss it with your partner.

But I suspect that the 20 seconds of that discussion would be better spent on finding a way to create world peace. It will be just as useful and just as productive.
0

#20 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2010-March-23, 09:19

dickiegera, on Mar 22 2010, 11:56 AM, said:

Dealer holding
Scoring: MP


Should opening bid be 1, 3 , 4 or
something else???
Thank you

tell your story as fast as you can so 3 but no real quibble with 1
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users