Multi-2D! ( Weak only ) weak 2H or 2S
#1
Posted 2010-March-09, 18:47
Righty deals and opens a weak two-bid in either Major.
What action do you take ? :
Q 9 8 6 x x
x
x x
K 8 x x
Edit: Eric Rodwell overcalled 2S ( see my later reply ).
#2
Posted 2010-March-09, 20:43
#3
Posted 2010-March-09, 22:17
CSGibson, on Mar 9 2010, 08:43 PM, said:
ROFL I'd pass a 2♥ opener so why wouldn't I pass now.
Easiest pass ever posted here.
#5
Posted 2010-March-09, 23:49
#6
Posted 2010-March-10, 02:18
nigel_k, on Mar 10 2010, 12:49 AM, said:
Even if this "works" and LHO does bid 4♠, I think pd is likely to bid 5♥
#7
Posted 2010-March-10, 02:40
#8
Posted 2010-March-10, 03:08
George Carlin
#9
Posted 2010-March-10, 03:11
At the other table my teammate passed on RHO's hand, my hand opened multi, over the 2♥ P/C response my teammate bid 2♠, that got doubled and also went for 800.
My track record against multi for the last few years is therefore quite bad. I'm not overcalling here!
#10
Posted 2010-March-10, 03:36
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#12
Posted 2010-March-10, 07:46
ONEferBRID, on Mar 9 2010, 07:47 PM, said:
Righty deals and opens a weak two-bid in either Major.
What action do you take ? :
Q 9 8 6 x x
x
x x
K 8 x x
I believe the applicable meta-agreement is "don't preempt over preempts" which can loosely be read as don't bid with a preemptive hand after they preempt.
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#13
Posted 2010-March-10, 08:26
pooltuna, on Mar 10 2010, 04:46 PM, said:
ONEferBRID, on Mar 9 2010, 07:47 PM, said:
Righty deals and opens a weak two-bid in either Major.
What action do you take ? :
Q 9 8 6 x x
x
x x
K 8 x x
I believe the applicable meta-agreement is "don't preempt over preempts" which can loosely be read as don't bid with a preemptive hand after they preempt.
????
I had always understood that this expression described the definition of jump overcalls after preemptive openings.
Consider the following two auction
(1♦) - 2♠
(2♦) - 3♠
In the first auction, the jump overcall shows a preemptive hand.
In the second auction, the jump overcall shows a strong hand.
#14
Posted 2010-March-10, 09:01
hrothgar, on Mar 10 2010, 09:26 AM, said:
pooltuna, on Mar 10 2010, 04:46 PM, said:
ONEferBRID, on Mar 9 2010, 07:47 PM, said:
Righty deals and opens a weak two-bid in either Major.
What action do you take ? :
Q 9 8 6 x x
x
x x
K 8 x x
I believe the applicable meta-agreement is "don't preempt over preempts" which can loosely be read as don't bid with a preemptive hand after they preempt.
????
I had always understood that this expression described the definition of jump overcalls after preemptive openings.
Consider the following two auction
(1♦) - 2♠
(2♦) - 3♠
In the first auction, the jump overcall shows a preemptive hand.
In the second auction, the jump overcall shows a strong hand.
so WTP in the last auction (2♦) 3♠ you are prevented by agreements from holding the OP's hand or equivalent. What I am saying is you should not even dream of making a 2♠ call with the hand.
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#15
Posted 2010-March-10, 09:07
pooltuna, on Mar 10 2010, 06:01 PM, said:
hrothgar, on Mar 10 2010, 09:26 AM, said:
pooltuna, on Mar 10 2010, 04:46 PM, said:
ONEferBRID, on Mar 9 2010, 07:47 PM, said:
Righty deals and opens a weak two-bid in either Major.
What action do you take ? :
Q 9 8 6 x x
x
x x
K 8 x x
I believe the applicable meta-agreement is "don't preempt over preempts" which can loosely be read as don't bid with a preemptive hand after they preempt.
????
I had always understood that this expression described the definition of jump overcalls after preemptive openings.
Consider the following two auction
(1♦) - 2♠
(2♦) - 3♠
In the first auction, the jump overcall shows a preemptive hand.
In the second auction, the jump overcall shows a strong hand.
so WTP in the last auction (2♦) 3♠ you are prevented by agreements from holding the OP's hand or equivalent. What I am saying is you should not even dream of making a 2♠ call with the hand.
There is a parallel thread going on about the correct course of action when someone states something you believe to be is factually incorrect.
It is my understanding that the expression "You don't preempt over a preempt" has a fairly specific meaning and said meaning has nothing to do with the strength requirements for direct overcalls.
#16
Posted 2010-March-10, 09:09
bed
#17
Posted 2010-March-10, 09:10
But that was not the case with a distiguished pair.
Quote
You are right, Art, this pair needs a "Meckwell"category all by itself.
2♠ was overcalled by none other than Eric Rodwell.
The deal, from a national team championship a number of years ago, was reprinted in a recent newspaper column.
(2D!) - 2S - (3C) - pass
pass - 3S - ( p ) - 4S
all pass
Jeff Meckstroth held:
A x x
Q T x
A K Q J T
9 x
Edit: The hand made by keeping the 2D! bidder (who's partner held the stiff ♠K and the ♣ A Q J x x ) off lead !
#18
Posted 2010-March-10, 09:20
bed
#20
Posted 2010-March-10, 09:51
e-mail: gorenbridge@aol.com