Obviously, a low diamond lead and a heart return can beat it double dummy, but underleading AK isn't really the first lead thought of here...
ATB
#1
Posted 2010-March-03, 22:29
Obviously, a low diamond lead and a heart return can beat it double dummy, but underleading AK isn't really the first lead thought of here...
#3
Posted 2010-March-03, 22:51
#5
Posted 2010-March-04, 02:13
Don't like the 2nd pass of west
That's 2-0
I forced myself to read on
Don't like the 3rd pass of west, although it's not as aweful as the previous actions
Don't like the 4th pass of west
That makes 3.5-0
I blame west
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4c04/e4c04af6171f715eac55af5d6d276f5e52e2cf73" alt=";)"
#6
Posted 2010-March-04, 06:30
So blame to both.
BTW if West had bid 5♦ over 4♠, maybe East would have found the lead of a small diamond against 5♠. But I suppose East bids 6♦ if West bids 5.
#7
Posted 2010-March-04, 06:56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76e7c/76e7c83357a8810ac6243165f60c4989ee4e25a1" alt=":lol:"
West needs to act before christmas
#8
Posted 2010-March-04, 07:15
George Carlin
#9
Posted 2010-March-04, 08:01
jjbrr, on Mar 4 2010, 01:30 AM, said:
Yeah... that's what I was thinking when I saw dummy tabled. The other thought was oh crap... partner has length in the minors (after my AK♦ was ruffed on rd 2)
#10
Posted 2010-March-04, 08:13
Fluffy, on Mar 4 2010, 01:56 PM, said:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76e7c/76e7c83357a8810ac6243165f60c4989ee4e25a1" alt=":lol:"
Ah yes of course. 6♦ doesn't make either.
5♠X-1 is par. So well bid both
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0731/f07315330c72d721a433df91b1dcf64ddc348248" alt=":P"
#11
Posted 2010-March-04, 08:43
#12
Posted 2010-March-04, 08:45
helene_t, on Mar 4 2010, 07:30 AM, said:
Meh I agree generally with this shape but east does have solid clubs so I think 5C is fine. If partner is weak and you start getting tapped playing in diamonds opposite 3-1 in the minors could be a disaster.
#13
Posted 2010-March-04, 08:51
helene_t, on Mar 4 2010, 09:13 AM, said:
I realize you were being facetious, but since there's another thread about determining par...
EW can bid 6♣ making... so NS would sac in 6♥x-1 for par (same score as you said)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76e7c/76e7c83357a8810ac6243165f60c4989ee4e25a1" alt=";)"
#14
Posted 2010-March-07, 04:48
#15
Posted 2010-March-08, 03:24
Seriously tilt-inducing to get handed a zero by someone who bids the way South does.
#16
Posted 2010-March-08, 16:54
Am probably in the minority, but I tend to ignore opp's takeout doubles and make the bid (or its equivalent) that I was going to make if south had passed. Probably would have responded 1NT at this vul with 1 Dia a close 2nd and 1H a distant 3rd choice (I tend to not bid poor 4-card heart suits in this situation.). At least partner will know that I have a little something, and 1NT does have some pre-emptive potential should the hands be a little more normal. I prefer to say my piece asap as opposed to having to giving opps more room. If you play 1NT as showing a better hand, then I would respond 1D (at least I'm bidding something that I might like partner to lead if defending.).
DHL
1♣-(X)-p-(2♠)
3♦-(4♠)-p-(p)
5♣-(p)-p-(5♠)
X-AP
5Sx = -650