Choice of Games
#1
Posted 2010-February-03, 04:10
#4
Posted 2010-February-03, 04:23
#5
Posted 2010-February-03, 04:28
#6
Posted 2010-February-03, 04:28
Quote
Don't you plan to win 5 spades anyway in NT? I think the issue is that if you have no stoppers in a suit and it happens to be partner's doubleton you're likely to lose 5 or 4 in NT instead of only 2 by playing in the Major. If I have all suits stopped I'd prefer to play NT, and I think this should be decided the moment partner transfers so that I don't stop over 3Nt and let them know I have a problem deciding whether to play in a trump or not with the 4333.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#7
Posted 2010-February-03, 04:29
hotShot, on Feb 3 2010, 05:23 AM, said:
uhh lol. When you ruff in the long hand, you don't gain a trick?
#8
Posted 2010-February-03, 05:32
Suppose that partner has a 5M-4m type that always wants to play a 5-3 fit if there's one available, but isn't interested in slam, five of the minor, or a 5-2 fit. What does he do?
If he normally shows his second suit anyway, I'd usually pass 3NT with a 4333 shape. If he normally bids 3NT, I'd usually bid four of the major.
#9
Posted 2010-February-03, 05:35
gnasher, on Feb 3 2010, 06:32 AM, said:
With a 5-4 my partner's show a hand that want to play in a 5-3 fit. For us transfer followed by 3NT shows a 5332.
I play different methods with different partners but we all have two ways to show a choice of games.
#10
Posted 2010-February-03, 05:39
hanp, on Feb 3 2010, 12:35 PM, said:
That's clearly the best approach.
#11
Posted 2010-February-03, 11:06
At IMPs, I obviously want to bid the safest game, and if I judge that our combined hands will take 9 tricks more safely than taking 10 in the major, then it is ok to play 3NT. It's not so much than I'm exactly 4-3-3-3 opposite exactly 5-3-3-2, but that certainly is a reason to think that NT MIGHT be safer.
#12
Posted 2010-February-03, 11:24
Not sure if the scoring matters. Conventional wisdom says that one should play 3NT more often at matchpoints, but if the number of tricks in NT and suit have similar distributions except for a different median, you should at IMP go for the suit contract when the difference is at least one trick, while at MPs the threshold may be as little as half a trick, depending on the field. Now it seems plausible that the number of tricks have higher variance in NT than in a suit contract, but the difference would have to be substantial for 3NT to be more attractive than 4M at matchpoints than at IMPs.
#13
Posted 2010-February-03, 11:40