two bidding problems, same convention
#1
Posted 2010-February-01, 05:40
JT9xxx
x
Kx
2♣*-3♣-4♦-?
2♣=strong any or 4-7 with diamonds.
xxx
xx
xxxxx
xxx
2♣*-p-?
in both these cases the 2♣ opener was dealer and favorable at imps.
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2010-February-01, 05:59
The second one I bid 2♦, most likely partner is strong.
#3
Posted 2010-February-01, 07:19
The 2nd is easy: 2♦ it will be more interesting next round. At that point I would like to know if 2♣ is GF, SF or only strong.
#4
Posted 2010-February-01, 07:32
On the second hand, I should abstain because I would never play this convention, but anyway 2♦ is obvious even to me.
#6
Posted 2010-February-01, 09:46
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#8
Posted 2010-February-01, 13:00
#9
Posted 2010-February-01, 13:27
2nd 2♦ seems obivous
#10
Posted 2010-February-01, 13:58
#11
Posted 2010-February-01, 14:06
jdonn, on Feb 1 2010, 02:58 PM, said:
I think it's an awesome convention. Sure you payoff to rare hand types like this where you're super weak in diamonds and partner is also weak in diamonds and RHO couldn't bid (basically never), but when you actually have a 2C opener the opps cannot really massively interfere because they're assuming you have a weak opener.
edit: Obviously the biggest payoff is if you have a weak 2 in diamonds and they have more room, but if you're going to play say multi, I would much prefer to play 2C=weak 2 in diamonds or strong 2C than just play 2C=strong 2C.
#12
Posted 2010-February-01, 14:11
But I really should stop criticizing things I have never played! !h convention.
#13
Posted 2010-February-01, 14:17
Of course you also lose on the hands when you open 2♣ on some complicated hand and partner bids a lot of diamonds, but I just wanted to make this clear.
George Carlin
#14
Posted 2010-February-01, 14:23
2♦ = GF opposite SF+
2♥ = would have passed a semiforcing in ♥ / 14+ with good 5+♥
2♠ = 1 trick for ♥ not for ♠ / 14+ with good 5+♠
A numerical simulation has shown that weak vs weak comes up once every 5 years, and strong vs strong you need to be Methusalem.
#15
Posted 2010-February-02, 13:20
#16
Posted 2010-February-02, 13:53
The second one I did not actually open 2♣ but 1♠. I had (gulp)
KQJ9xx
A
A
AKJxx
and wanted to try out new things. My endeavor almost ended in despair when it started
1♠-p-p-
but then it went
2♥
4♣-p-4♠-p
p-tank pass (I wanted to redouble but he passed
![:(](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)
Johann told me he would never have jump raised diamonds since it was all but sure I was strong. Of course now it's quite clear to me too.
George Carlin
#17
Posted 2010-February-02, 14:10