BBO Discussion Forums: Strong Enough? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Strong Enough?

#1 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2010-January-18, 11:48

xxx AKJ10xx xxx A

(1)-P-(1)-?

r/w, IMPs
Kevin Fay
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-January-18, 11:49

1. 2 if playing it as intermediate (as I think it should).
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,262
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-January-18, 11:54

2H.

Independent of what I play 2H, since we are red vs. green, a 2H bid is
not based on garbage.
Another point is, partner is a passed hand, if he has hearts brilliant,
otherwise he should shut up.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#4 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-January-18, 12:01

2 intermediate is both a good agreement and the bid I would make here.
OK
bed
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-January-18, 12:05

KQJT9x and out is a good 2H bid if it's played as weak (particularly if you've 4 cards in a minor and singleton in spades). Weak and intermediate are not interchangeable or overlapping.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2010-January-18, 13:27

kfay, on Jan 18 2010, 12:48 PM, said:

xxx AKJ10xx xxx A

(1)-P-(1)-?

r/w, IMPs

At these colors 2 should be a good description of your hand to partner
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#7 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2010-January-18, 13:38

1.

People respond light and you can still make games in this situation. So I think 2 is too much of an underbid unless we have specifically agreed it's intermediate. We could have a lot less, even r/w.
0

#8 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,262
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-January-18, 13:49

gwnn, on Jan 18 2010, 01:05 PM, said:

KQJT9x and out is a good 2H bid if it's played as weak (particularly if you've 4 cards in a minor and singleton in spades). Weak and intermediate are not interchangeable or overlapping.

Sure, that would be enough for a weak 2H bid, and I would also make the
2H bid, even with a 6332 shape.
Given that we are facing a passed p, I really dont care, what p expects for 2H.

Of course p knowes, that my bids are fairly wide ranging in this specific situation.

Anyway the only troubling card is the single Ace, why should this card stop me
from bidding a weak 2H?

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#9 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-January-18, 13:56

because you're too strong. partner is not a passed hand. he could have as much as

AKJx Qxx xxx xxx (could have a lot more with xxxx of clubs) and we just missed game. oops!
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#10 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,262
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-January-18, 14:14

gwnn, on Jan 18 2010, 02:56 PM, said:

because you're too strong. partner is not a passed hand. he could have as much as

AKJx Qxx xxx xxx (could have a lot more with xxxx of clubs) and we just missed game. oops!

Sure, he could have this, and most of the time one can handle this. :ph34r:

#1 partner could have overcalled 1S
#2 partner can and should make a constructive raise in hearts, since all
of his values are working.

Of course the widerange has it draw back, and sometimes you will miss
game, but it also has its plus, sometimes you will be able to buy the contract
cheaply and win the part score battle.
Pay the price and as long as your are happy with what you get, there is no
real issue.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#11 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-January-18, 14:29

and I'm not happy with that. but looks like we're both happy. but I don't think your question "why should this card stop me from bidding a weak 2H?" -which would imply that it is irrelevant- is quite accurate. There is a good reason why it should stop you (just like there is reason why it shouldn't).
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#12 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-January-18, 14:42

Yes I'm strong enough for 1.

How is it we get an intermediate hand and all of a sudden everyone plays intermediate jump overcalls? :) I must admit I still don't and have never particularly wanted to. I think I get in more trouble not vul when my hands are worse than I do preempting when vul.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#13 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2010-January-18, 14:44

huh? wtp here???
0

#14 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2010-January-18, 15:22

jdonn, on Jan 18 2010, 03:42 PM, said:

Yes I'm strong enough for 1.

How is it we get an intermediate hand and all of a sudden everyone plays intermediate jump overcalls? :) I must admit I still don't and have never particularly wanted to. I think I get in more trouble not vul when my hands are worse than I do preempting when vul.

On this particular hand, you can still go for 500 at the 1-level!! Are you surprised? ;)

JDonn >> All
Kevin Fay
0

#15 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2010-January-18, 15:26

jdonn, on Jan 18 2010, 03:42 PM, said:

Yes I'm strong enough for 1.

How is it we get an intermediate hand and all of a sudden everyone plays intermediate jump overcalls? :) I must admit I still don't and have never particularly wanted to. I think I get in more trouble not vul when my hands are worse than I do preempting when vul.

I personally have played intermediate JS red on white for years. This hand applies.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#16 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2010-January-18, 15:32

While my card says I play weak jump overcalls.... In this position, like I've seen JLall say on the forums before... a weak jump overcall IS an intermediate jump.

I can't really imagine bidding 2 with less...
Kevin Fay
0

#17 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-January-18, 15:41

I don't recall him saying that.

seriously you wouldn't bid 2 with

x
KQJT9x
Qxxx
xx

?

not sure what you mean it IS an intermediate jump. to me that just sounds like some people discussing whether or not a weak NT 3rd seat R/R and me intervening with "in this position a weak no trump IS strong". maybe I'm not good at connotative language.

it's either weak or intermediate. weak means you'd open 2 with it. intermediate means you'd open 1 and rebid 2 with it (with possible suit quality/purity requirements). it may be something in between (8-12) but you can't say a weak 2 is an intermediate 2.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#18 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2010-January-18, 15:45

gwnn, on Jan 18 2010, 04:41 PM, said:

I don't recall him saying that.

seriously you wouldn't bid 2 with

x
KQJT9x
Qxxx
xx

?

not sure what you mean it IS an intermediate jump. that just sounds like "in this position a weak no trump IS strong" to me. maybe I'm not good at connotative language.

it's either weak or intermediate. weak means you'd open 2 with it. intermediate means you'd open 1 and rebid 2 with it (with possible suit quality/purity requirements). it may be something in between (8-12) but you can't say a weak 2 is an intermediate 2.

Gwnn the search master?

http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?sho...ndpost&p=371957
Kevin Fay
0

#19 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-January-18, 15:46

hmmm? he says he likes intermediate jump shifts. he doesn't say a weak jump shift IS intermediate.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#20 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-January-18, 15:49

kfay, on Jan 18 2010, 04:32 PM, said:

While my card says I play weak jump overcalls.... In this position, like I've seen JLall say on the forums before... a weak jump overcall IS an intermediate jump.

I can't really imagine bidding 2 with less...

What the heck, this hand without the ace of clubs is a perfectly sound perfectly good vul weak jump overcall but not at all good enough for an intermediate jump overcall.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users