BBO Discussion Forums: clarification - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

clarification 2n/t response to a 2cl bid

#21 User is offline   Old York 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 447
  • Joined: 2007-January-26
  • Location:York, England
  • Interests:People, Places, Humour

Posted 2010-January-14, 11:07

Codo, on Jan 14 2010, 09:53 AM, said:

Old York, on Jan 11 2010, 02:15 AM, said:

Quote "You continue with transfers. "

I have seen the bid made many times showing both majors, but not showing a maximum. Perhaps this is the problem.
1NT-2♣-2NT-3♠(trf)-4♥ going 1 down was bad when opener was minimum

Tony

Interessting way to play transfer with 3 ♠ tzo show hearts.

As Td, I had been called to the table by opponents. I have no idea what 3♠ actually showed and doubt that anyone at the table knew. It is possible that it was intended to show 4 bad spades and 5 hearts, some sort of smolen bid, dunno
My decision was "no agreement-no damage-result stands"

The point of this thread, and this hand, is that players are rebidding 2NT with no agreement, confusing partner and opponents

Tony
Hanging on in quiet desperation, is the English way (Pink Floyd)
0

#22 User is offline   pirate22 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 638
  • Joined: 2008-November-06
  • Location:asia at present time now HK time
  • Interests:Bridge- scuba-natural sex,no porn:)<br> Associate member I.B.P.A. workaholic

Posted 2010-January-22, 10:29

2n/t--3hts(TR) 3nt imply-partner shut up i have a xx spade only
regards p.s what was your hand missing a diamond slam ole York?
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users