Incorporating Multi and Tartan into SMP how to bid the precision 2D hand? 4414 or 3415 with short diomonds
#1
Posted 2019-February-08, 09:54
Looking forward to suggestions from experienced SMP players.
#2
Posted 2019-February-09, 12:50
2♦ = Multi.
2♥ = 4415 minus one card (the 2♦ opening i SMP).
2♠ = Tartan.
In Sweden it is common to play strong club and multi, with 2M available for weak meanings. Then the 2♣ opening can be a five card suit though (five clubs and a four card major). With 4414 you open 1♦.
If you want 2♣ to promise 6+ clubs, and want both Multi and Tartan, I think 1♦ will be too overloaded. One of the most overloaded 1♦ openings I know of (in a "serious system") is in F-club, played by Mats Nilsland and Björn Fallenius. It is published and available as an e-book. Excerpt regarding the 1♦ opening here. Here you can buy the full book: http://www.scaniabri...strongclub.html Their 1♦ opening can also have 6+ clubs, so even more overloaded.
Another way could be to play a weak no trump (perhaps 12-15 or 11-14) and open stronger balanced hands with 1♣ (maybe you can use the multi and 2NT for some very strong balanced hands). Now you have removed the balanced hands from 1♦, which should make continuations easier. A system which does something similar is The Unbalanced Diamond by Marshall Miles, but his 1♦ opening includes ALL unbalanced hands without a five card major (if I remember correctly). Here's a summary: http://web.mit.edu/m...ced_Diamond.pdf
Yet another way could be to put the balanced range in 1♦ (12-15 or maybe 11-14, like above) and use an artificial 1NT opening. I guess it depends on if you like opening weak NT or not. So something like this maybe:
1♣ = Strong.
1♦ = 12-15 NT, or 6+ diamonds, or a 4 card major and a minor.
1M = 5+ major.
1NT = Both minors.
2♣ = 6+ clubs.
2♦ = Multi.
2M = Tartan.
Another option if an unnatural 1NT opening is okay could be to be inspired by the 1♦ opening awm's IMPrecision: http://www.infobridg...IMprecision.pdf
Then you could use:
1♣ = Strong.
1♦ = 12-15 NT, or "three-suited" without a five card major (5431, 4441, or 5440), or 5-5 minors.
1M = 5+ major.
1NT = 6+ diamonds.
2♣ = 6+ clubs.
2♦ = Multi.
2M = Tartan.
#3
Posted 2019-February-09, 18:50
But maybe it's a bit overkill to make such radical changes for such a minor problem.
Other than what Kungsgeten suggests, you could also just pretend that the problem doesn't exist. Just tell the smallest lie. 1NT, 1M or 2♣ depending on texture. Or pass with 11 points and maybe some 12-counts.
#4
Posted 2019-February-09, 20:47
helene_t, on 2019-February-09, 18:50, said:
In that spirit, if you open light in 3rd seat (I know SMP isn’t a light opening version of precision, but it’s no major changes to play the precision non-1♣ bids as 9-15 instead of 11-15), you could just pass all those troublesome hands entirely. If partner can’t open light in 3-4th, you probably won’t miss anything and 4441 hands aren’t a super promising shape anyway. I take this a bit farther with my Silent Club strong club system and pass the precision 2♣ hands as well, but that presumes you want 2♣ free for a weak or other use.
#5
Posted 2019-February-10, 04:53
Kungsgeten, on 2019-February-09, 12:50, said:
2♦ = Multi.
2♥ = 4415 minus one card (the 2♦ opening i SMP).
2♠ = Tartan.
In Sweden it is common to play strong club and multi, with 2M available for weak meanings. Then the 2♣ opening can be a five card suit though (five clubs and a four card major). With 4414 you open 1♦.
If you want 2♣ to promise 6+ clubs, and want both Multi and Tartan, I think 1♦ will be too overloaded. One of the most overloaded 1♦ openings I know of (in a "serious system") is in F-club, played by Mats Nilsland and Björn Fallenius. It is published and available as an e-book. Excerpt regarding the 1♦ opening here. Here you can buy the full book: http://www.scaniabri...strongclub.html Their 1♦ opening can also have 6+ clubs, so even more overloaded.
Another way could be to play a weak no trump (perhaps 12-15 or 11-14) and open stronger balanced hands with 1♣ (maybe you can use the multi and 2NT for some very strong balanced hands). Now you have removed the balanced hands from 1♦, which should make continuations easier. A system which does something similar is The Unbalanced Diamond by Marshall Miles, but his 1♦ opening includes ALL unbalanced hands without a five card major (if I remember correctly). Here's a summary: http://web.mit.edu/m...ced_Diamond.pdf
Yet another way could be to put the balanced range in 1♦ (12-15 or maybe 11-14, like above) and use an artificial 1NT opening. I guess it depends on if you like opening weak NT or not. So something like this maybe:
1♣ = Strong.
1♦ = 12-15 NT, or 6+ diamonds, or a 4 card major and a minor.
1M = 5+ major.
1NT = Both minors.
2♣ = 6+ clubs.
2♦ = Multi.
2M = Tartan.
Another option if an unnatural 1NT opening is okay could be to be inspired by the 1♦ opening awm's IMPrecision: http://www.infobridg...IMprecision.pdf
Then you could use:
1♣ = Strong.
1♦ = 12-15 NT, or "three-suited" without a five card major (5431, 4441, or 5440), or 5-5 minors.
1M = 5+ major.
1NT = 6+ diamonds.
2♣ = 6+ clubs.
2♦ = Multi.
2M = Tartan.
Thanks for this detailed reply! Actually, the simplest solution of giving up the Tartan 2♥ looks the most practical. I'm not a big fan of giving up the natural 1NT, so i guess i will look into more detail of the problems associated with overloading 1♦ to keep the natural 1NT and add multi and the 2M 2 suiters to SMP(Yes! i mean 'standard modern precision').
#6
Posted 2019-February-10, 04:58
rbforster, on 2019-February-09, 20:47, said:
I'm OK with passing the 11,12 counts but passing the 13,14,15 counts would be too radical IMHO.
#7
Posted 2019-February-10, 05:01
helene_t, on 2019-February-09, 18:50, said:
But maybe it's a bit overkill to make such radical changes for such a minor problem.
Other than what Kungsgeten suggests, you could also just pretend that the problem doesn't exist. Just tell the smallest lie. 1NT, 1M or 2♣ depending on texture. Or pass with 11 points and maybe some 12-counts.
Passing the 11,12 counts with the 4414 shape is excellent bridge IMHO. However, the 4315 shape is more promising, and so are the 4414 hands with 13-15 HCP. I'll dive into this a bit deeper. Thanks for your great suggestions helene_t.
#8
Posted 2019-February-10, 16:06
rbforster, on 2019-February-09, 20:47, said:
Ha-ha, there was a junior pair at the Leeds Congress a few years ago that played the "only green cards in my box" system. They scored some 65%.
One advantage of that system is that you don't need to practice bidding and declarer play so you can focus 100% on developing your defense