BBO Discussion Forums: After a redouble - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

After a redouble Bid meanings after a redouble

#1 User is offline   jdaming 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 115
  • Joined: 2007-August-07

Posted 2009-September-25, 13:20

Bidding has gone:
1 - DBL- RDBL- Pass
2 - Pass - ???

Playing with a brand new partner (ADV level) what would you expect the meaning of 2, 2, and 3 to be? Forcing or not? Feel free to comment on any other interesting/non-natural bids here!

What is your favorite system with regular partnership?
All IMO. Junior wanting to soak up all the knowledge he can.
0

#2 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2009-September-25, 14:58

jdaming, on Sep 25 2009, 02:20 PM, said:

Bidding has gone:
1 - DBL- RDBL- Pass
2 - Pass - ???

Playing with a brand new partner (ADV level) what would you expect the meaning of 2, 2, and 3 to be? Forcing or not? Feel free to comment on any other interesting/non-natural bids here!

What is your favorite system with regular partnership?

Why bid 2. Give the opponents an opportunity to put their heads on the chopping block where you or your partner get a chance to take a whack. This assumes of course that the opponents are not playing "must save" by the bidder after the XX and where pass means "I want to play this XX"
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-September-25, 17:39

2 is forcing, like an uncontested 1-2 in Standard American.
2 is non-forcing and shows preference.
3 ought to be a non-forcing 3-card limit raise, but it's probably treated as forcing by most people.

pooltuna said:

Why bid 2. Give the opponents an opportunity to put their heads on the chopping block where you or your partner get a chance to take a whack.

Are you seriously suggesting that there is no hand on which opener should bid 2?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2009-September-26, 08:41

gnasher, on Sep 25 2009, 06:39 PM, said:

2 is forcing, like an uncontested 1-2 in Standard American.
2 is non-forcing and shows preference.
3 ought to be a non-forcing 3-card limit raise, but it's probably treated as forcing by most people.

pooltuna said:

Why bid 2. Give the opponents an opportunity to put their heads on the chopping block where you or your partner get a chance to take a whack.

Are you seriously suggesting that there is no hand on which opener should bid 2?

No I am sure I will eventually run across one but in most cases I think pass should be the first option. Again that assumes XX does not guarantee 3 card support but is instead meant as "this is our hand"
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#5 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-September-26, 08:42

pooltuna, on Sep 26 2009, 09:41 AM, said:

gnasher, on Sep 25 2009, 06:39 PM, said:

2 is forcing, like an uncontested 1-2 in Standard American.
2 is non-forcing and shows preference.
3 ought to be a non-forcing 3-card limit raise, but it's probably treated as forcing by most people.

pooltuna said:

Why bid 2. Give the opponents an opportunity to put their heads on the chopping block where you or your partner get a chance to take a whack.

Are you seriously suggesting that there is no hand on which opener should bid 2?

No I am sure I will eventually run across one but in most cases I think pass should be the first option. Again that assumes XX does not guarantee 3 card support but is instead meant as "this is our hand"

x KQJxx xx KQJxx seems like a good example, although even this is a bit extreme. Something like x AQxxxx Qx KJxx is a possibility. I suppose the best example would be something like xx Jxxxx x AKQJx B)
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#6 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-September-26, 09:00

good examples by AK the Volcano. Our agreement is simple --When xx denies fit and establishes it is our hand, getting in the way of the redoubler's follow-up action with a rebid shows a poor hand for defense and extra distribution.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#7 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2009-September-26, 11:51

Before going into responder's second calls, hope you both would agree that 2C says "I don't want to defend a low level contract". What one might describe as normal opening hands, would Pass instead of bidding 2C.
0

#8 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-September-26, 12:21

peachy, on Sep 26 2009, 12:51 PM, said:

Before going into responder's second calls, hope you both would agree that 2C says "I don't want to defend a low level contract".  What one might describe as normal opening hands, would Pass instead of bidding 2C.

:rolleyes: not entirely...might have been willing to defend a low-level club contract.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#9 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-September-28, 03:27

I think ther most common approach here is that XX forces till a penalty double or 2 NT. There is no exception just because partner did not pass.

With my standard partner I play that new suits are forcing, heart raises invitational, club raises forcing. (We cannot have a forcing and a non forcing raise below 3 NT).
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users