How would you bid this? Rate the bidding so far and bid...
#1
Posted 2009-September-06, 06:38
♠
♥AK7
♦AQJ9xxxx
♣xx
It goes:
1♠ 2♦
2♠ 3♦
3♠ 4♦
5♦ ???
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#3
Posted 2009-September-06, 07:06
Hanoi5, on Sep 6 2009, 07:38 AM, said:
♠
♥AK7
♦AQJ9xxxx
♣xx
It goes:
1♠ 2♦
2♠ 3♦
3♠ 4♦
5♦ ???
I hate 3♦ unless it was forcing. But yes I bite the bullet and bid 6
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#4
Posted 2009-September-06, 07:20
#5
Posted 2009-September-06, 07:53
4D should have set diamonds as tumps and should also have shown
serious slam interest, so 5D was the weakes bid partner had av.
If you bid slam now, your intention was to bid slam after partner opened,
because at every turn your partner choose to make the weakes bid.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2009-September-06, 08:00
pooltuna, on Sep 7 2009, 12:06 AM, said:
Hanoi5, on Sep 6 2009, 07:38 AM, said:
♠
♥AK7
♦AQJ9xxxx
♣xx
It goes:
1♠ 2♦
2♠ 3♦
3♠ 4♦
5♦ ???
I hate 3♦ unless it was forcing. But yes I bite the bullet and bid 6
!? unless it was forcing? You really thought someone will bid this NF 3♦ with *8* of them after partner opened?
I would pass 5♦ and thought it was an easy pass. Partner could have done something over 4♦ if he has any life but didn't. 5♦ could even be going down if partner has nothing in clubs...
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#7
Posted 2009-September-06, 10:32
2♠ was weak,
3♠ was weaker still,
5♦ was still screaming WEAK...
#8
Posted 2009-September-06, 11:07
We probably have a diamond loser and a club loser. Frankly we might be too high
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dd20/0dd207db57e6c9c8de9c9d0b4299e4c8282a573e" alt=";)"
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#9
Posted 2009-September-06, 11:11
Phil, on Sep 6 2009, 12:07 PM, said:
We probably have a diamond loser and a club loser. Frankly we might be too high
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dd20/0dd207db57e6c9c8de9c9d0b4299e4c8282a573e" alt=";)"
yep. And obviously the OP's 3D was forcing in their agreements, or he wouldn't have given it with that hand. Partner has had enough chances to help, time to pass.
#10
Posted 2009-September-06, 11:24
1S-2D (GF nat)
2S-3D (2S does not promise six, 3D extra length)
3S-4D (six spades, 4D sets diamonds and slam interest)
5D-P (5D=nothing to cue, can't RKC either)
#11
Posted 2009-September-06, 11:25
1S-2D
2S-3C
3S-5D
#12
Posted 2009-September-06, 12:42
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#13
Posted 2009-September-06, 13:54
Cascade, on Sep 6 2009, 01:42 PM, said:
maybe diamondwood, or maybe they just don't like to jump around in GF auctions.
#14
Posted 2009-September-06, 16:37
Cascade, on Sep 6 2009, 01:42 PM, said:
A picture jump. Spade support, great diamonds, no side controls.
On the actual hand -- pass. Partner doesn't have the King of diamonds and the Ace of clubs or the Ace and King of clubs.
-P.J. Painter.
#15
Posted 2009-September-06, 19:08
kenrexford, on Sep 6 2009, 05:37 PM, said:
Cascade, on Sep 6 2009, 01:42 PM, said:
A picture jump. Spade support, great diamonds, no side controls.
On the actual hand -- pass. Partner doesn't have the King of diamonds and the Ace of clubs or the Ace and King of clubs.
actually, since 2S did not guarantee 6, 4S--not 4D should show that picture bid. However, the conclusion that opener does not have the ak of clubs or the king of diamonds and a club control is still absolute
#16
Posted 2009-September-06, 23:08
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/274ce/274ce020133380deb990fb6c8c6e63eb49ad59b6" alt=":)"
I can't imagine any other bid. Partner has a min opener with 6 or 7 ♠. 6♦ could be on, but we shouldn't dream of bidding it on this ugly, ugly auction.
#17
Posted 2009-September-06, 23:54
Phil, on Sep 7 2009, 12:07 AM, said:
We probably have a diamond loser and a club loser. Frankly we might be too high
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dd20/0dd207db57e6c9c8de9c9d0b4299e4c8282a573e" alt=":angry:"
Agree. Pass is clear. 5D could even be a void.
#18
Posted 2009-September-07, 03:38
Better pass.
#19
Posted 2009-September-07, 04:18
aguahombre, on Sep 6 2009, 08:08 PM, said:
kenrexford, on Sep 6 2009, 05:37 PM, said:
Cascade, on Sep 6 2009, 01:42 PM, said:
A picture jump. Spade support, great diamonds, no side controls.
On the actual hand -- pass. Partner doesn't have the King of diamonds and the Ace of clubs or the Ace and King of clubs.
actually, since 2S did not guarantee 6, 4S--not 4D should show that picture bid. However, the conclusion that opener does not have the ak of clubs or the king of diamonds and a club control is still absolute
I did not know that 2♦ denied three spades.
-P.J. Painter.
#20
Posted 2009-September-07, 05:41
As it is now, partner could have ♠KJ10xxxx ♥Qx ♦K ♣Axx and we would have cold slam, but most likelly its that we lose 2 clubs or 1 diamond and 1 club.