BBO Discussion Forums: European Universities Championship - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

European Universities Championship

#1 User is offline   ClaceyJ 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 2006-August-01

Posted 2009-September-11, 08:44

This is partially a rant, and partially seeing what other people think of a particularly annoying situation.

This October the European Universities championship will take place in Croatia. Myself and my friends, as Oxford University, won the right to represent England by winning the Portland Bowl, the English Universtities knockout competition. Many well known English players have represented England and their university in international university competitions as a result.

Only we can't go.

The European University Sports Association accepts entries from individual countries University sports federation. It does this as it believes bridge to be a sport, therefore runs the competition.

The British University Sports Association refuses to enter us as they dont think bridge is a sport.

Neither will budge. (EUSA wont take an entry from the EBU, BUSA refuses to enter us anyway) Therefore this universities championship will take place with no english team present, barring some last minute dec

On a personal level, I've put a lot of effort into university bridge, and this is my first opportunity to play. As a medical student with ever reducing free time, it may be my last. To be denied to play either because of peoples unwillingness to compromise, or partly because of the campaign to get bridge named a 'sport' (which is fundamentally where the problem originates from) seems grossly unfair.

I dont think writing this will help, but it's something I feel people should know about.

Thanks for reading.

Joe
0

#2 User is offline   NickRW 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,951
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sussex, England

Posted 2009-September-11, 08:53

Obv. this is wrong. Not sure which party you should shoot, probably BUSA.
"Pass is your friend" - my brother in law - who likes to bid a lot.
0

#3 User is online   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,613
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2009-September-11, 09:08

Silly question(s):

How was this handled in years past?
Has England ever competed in this event before?
If so, how did folks manage to address this same issue?

If worst comes to worst, it would be interesting to understand precisely what defines an individual county's University Sports Federation.

In theory, is there any reason that you and a couple like minded friends couldn't create a new University Sports Federations that reconized bridge as a sport (and didn't recognize anything else)?
Alderaan delenda est
0

#4 User is offline   ClaceyJ 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 2006-August-01

Posted 2009-September-11, 09:16

Not particularly silly questions.

Yes England has participated almost all previous years.
How was it handled in the past?- I dont know the exact answer, but I know in the past someone has backed down (EUSA usually I believe) This year it seems noone is willing to. I think this backing down may have led people to avoid solving the problem permanently.

Im pretty sure setting up our own organisation wouldn't work (I suspect you would have to play quite a fee to join EUSA, even if they would recognise two organisations from the same country(which I dont think they would))
0

#5 User is online   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,613
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2009-September-11, 10:14

ClaceyJ, on Sep 11 2009, 06:16 PM, said:

Not particularly silly questions.

Yes England has participated almost all previous years.
How was it handled in the past?- I dont know the exact answer, but I know in the past someone has backed down (EUSA usually I believe) This year it seems noone is willing to. I think this backing down may have led people to avoid solving the problem permanently.

Im pretty sure setting up our own organisation wouldn't work (I suspect you would have to play quite a fee to join EUSA, even if they would recognise two organisations from the same country(which I dont think they would))

Sounds quite annoying.

Is there anyone that you can sue?
Personal lawsuits often grab people's attention.
Alderaan delenda est
0

#6 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-September-11, 10:44

I had this very same problem in Spain years ago, I didn't find the answer.

Try complaining to the event's organicers. I remember participating once (not sure if it was this exact event) without my "individual countries University sports federation" ever noticing.
0

#7 User is offline   PeterGill 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 139
  • Joined: 2006-September-18

Posted 2009-September-11, 11:14

If I were you, I would email Anna Gudge anna @ ecats.co.uk as soon as Brazil is over - she would be very busy in Brazil. Anna works for the WBF, is English, and is a wonderful organiser and trouble-shooter who at least will always give you a prompt answer and try her best to put you in touch with the right person to solve this ridiculous situation. She has fixed up many such probems for the WBF before, without anyone even hearing about it becoming a problem.
0

#8 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-September-11, 11:48

Yeah in USA the answer would just be to get a lawyer to send a letter to the BSA threatening a lawsuit. Usually this would get them to back down. I understand that in other not-so-litigous countries this is not a reasonable option.
0

#9 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2009-September-11, 12:08

Normally when you hear one thing from party A and the opposite from party B, you try to get A and B together to resolve the problem. Is there anyone you can get a conference call together with the parties. It's a preferable option to email, where people can ignore your mails, but that may be your only recourse.

I do like the suggestion made by Peter of getting someone involved that has a lot of connections. They may be able to help you with the situation. I would think it would be in the EBU's interest to also get this resolved. Maybe one of the higher ups in the EBU can reach out to EUSA and/or BUSA?
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-September-11, 12:28

Jlall, on Sep 11 2009, 05:48 PM, said:

Yeah in USA the answer would just be to get a lawyer to send a letter to the BSA threatening a lawsuit. Usually this would get them to back down. I understand that in other not-so-litigous countries this is not a reasonable option.

This is the route that the spannish bridge federation (or should I rather say, the president himself, since he takes all decisions without asking anyone) has taken trying to force "Consejo Superior de Deportes" to accept bridge as a sport.

Taking a legal action against the guys who are suposed to give us some money when we become a sport is not working by now. More likelly the contrary, they hate us.
0

#11 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2009-September-11, 16:01

This makes me sad :D
Kevin Fay
0

#12 User is online   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,342
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2009-September-11, 16:23

Justin has it right. Lawsuits don't grap anyone's attention.

Peter's and Gnome's suggestions sound better. I would try both.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#13 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-September-11, 17:17

Asking Anna Gudge for help is certainly a good idea, if she isn't already involved.

Another (more divisive) possibility is to apply pressure on BUSA from above. Assuming that this organisation receives taxpayers' money, a sympathetic MP might be able to achieve something. You could try contacting bridge-playing MPs, such as the ones mentioned here:

http://www.ebu.co.uk...commons2008.htm
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#14 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2009-September-12, 05:52

So the country where Bridge somehow originated won-t accept it as a sport. How nice.

As someone else mentioned it is the BUSA whom you have to pressure the most. You should probably try a newspaper or something, try to use the media. Maybe appeal to patriotic feelings, too.

Write to the WBF, too and see is they can convince EUSA, but the problem will reamin in England so give your best shot to change BUSA.

Many countries have accepted bridge as a sport and being in one that has I suppose the problem with accepting bridge as a sport is that you accept you will have to give them money from the budget some time.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#15 User is offline   david_c 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,178
  • Joined: 2004-November-14
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Mathematics;<br>20th century classical music;<br>Composing.

Posted 2009-September-12, 06:40

Some of these posts surprise me: I think BUSA is blameless. Maybe bridge should be considered a sport, or maybe it shouldn't - either decision seems reasonable. But once it has been decided that bridge is not a sport for BUSA's purposes, then they can no longer claim to officially represent bridge. A BUSA staff memeber no longer has the authority to send off applications relating to bridge. They can pretend they have the authority, but that would be a lie, and very unprofessional, and it seems rather unfair to put pressure on them to do this.

Surely EUSA are the villains here. They must know perfectly well that not all sporting organisations include bridge as a sport, and yet they only accept entries through those organisations? That's mind-boggling. It comes across as EUSA being less interested in staging a bridge event, and more interested in using bridge players as pawns in the game of getting national organisations to recognise bridge as a sport.
0

#16 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2009-September-12, 07:32

This is completely absurd.

I played for England in this event the very first time it was held. I don't remember anything like this being a problem; I think our entry was sorted out by the EBU at the time.

I agree with others that the best hope of success is by getting pressure put on both organisations to come to an agreement. Other possible suggestions:

- Do other countries have this problem? It seems Spain do, is there anyone else? Are EUSA going to run out of entries if they remain pig-headed?

- Is there anyone senior at Oxford who likes bridge or is involved in their sporting organisation who might be persuaded to get involved on your behalf? In particular, has anyone dealt with one or both of EUSA/BUSA on behalf of other games/sports? Make it clear that you aren't actually trying to promote bridge as a sport, you just want to play in this event.

- Would anyone at the Portland Club be able to help? They still sponsor the Portland Bowl, after all... I don't know anyone there myself.
0

#17 User is offline   jeremy69 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 412
  • Joined: 2009-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2009-September-12, 09:02

I don't think BUSA are being consistent. They are also being absurd. If they look back in their record books (admittedly very many years) they did recognise bridge because there was some funding granted for a couple of University Championships and the university I was at would not award colours for bridge until it was recognised. In addition to contacting Anna as mentioned I would also contact the EBU General Manager (Barry@ebu.co.uk) to try and enlist his help.
0

#18 User is offline   ClaceyJ 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 2006-August-01

Posted 2009-September-12, 11:49

It appears that someone has decided to be kind.

Through no action of the university associations, we have been given permission to go. Someone on the organisation committee of the championship has taken it on themselves to make an exception for us, due to the (insert word here) views of the sports organisations.

This personally has made my day, and restored some faith.

However, this is still something that will need sorting in the future, as not everyone may find someone to take pity on them. I really appreciate the advice and thoughts of people, its helped. I am also lucky to have some hardworking teammates who have never given up.

Thanks to all

J
0

#19 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-September-12, 11:52

nice to hear that m8! good luck, you should win now to make them think twice next year :D
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#20 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-September-13, 09:43

Good luck dude. Have fun and enough beer :)
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users