BBO Discussion Forums: 11 Table Movement - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

11 Table Movement When a Bowman is not practical

#1 User is offline   NickRW 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,951
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sussex, England

Posted 2009-September-13, 14:08

I am posting this here because it just might be useful to someone somewhere other than me. I sometimes direct at a club that has a strong preference for playing 9 rounds of 3 boards (if we have to go to 2 board rounds, some members complain if we play 12 sets of 2 that they've been short changed and 13 rounds of 2 always seems to take longer so other members complain that it is a very late finish).

For 11 tables, on a normal club night, I and other directors normally take the easy option of putting out 11 sets of 3 boards and play 9 rounds of a straight Mitchell. However, I am not 100% happy that each pair has to miss 2 sets of boards at the best of times. On a night when we play a Sims, the organisers typically supply (or rather dictate) 32 boards - so we have to play it with an extra locally shuffled board - which is possible, but even less ideal.

At some clubs I play at, but do not direct for, they have the space to play an 11 table Bowman movement that uses only 9 sets of boards with 2 pairs of tables sharing (tables 1 and 10 share and table 11 shares with different tables around the room as the session progresses). However, I do not have the space to put table 11 in a central position, our playing area being long and thin with room for two rows of 5 tables - and I can squeeze an 11th or 12th table in by using space at the ends of the room - but the middle is too narrow. So, a Bowman (Appendix Mitchell) works nicely for 10.5 tables, but it is unsuitable for a full 11.

So, I've been scratching my head to find or think of a movement for 11 full tables that uses 9 or 10 sets of boards and will play for 9 rounds without inconvenient sharing. Finally I've thought of one. It is played as if it is a 10 table share and relay (relay and bye-stand is the American name I think). Table 11 is deliberately placed between 5 and 6 and uses what would have been the spare set of boards each round. Table 1 and 10 share in the normal way. East/West 11 are a roving pair and displace other E/W pairs as the session goes along (the displaced pair goes to table 11, and then, after, rejoins the circuit where they would have been)

This is the full thing
11 Full Tables                        
Table Numbers/Layout
       
10  1  2                            
   
9  3                                
   
8  4                                
   
7  5                                
   
6   11
                               
10 Table share+relay with NS11 using the relay and roving EW11                                          
Pair Nos as per table no                                        
Boards move down one including via table 11, so 6 passes to 11, 11 to 5                                        
Table 1 & 10 share                                      
EW
Pairs move up 1, except pair 11, noted below                                        
       
When moving up, table 11 is NOT part of the circuit, pairs move from 5 to 6                                  

Master schedule:
(Columns are NS, EW, Board set denoted as letters)
=Rnd 1          Rnd 2   Rnd 3   Rnd 4   Rnd 5   Rnd 6   Rnd 7   Rnd 8   Rnd 9                  
.1  1 a  1 10 b  1 11 c  1  8 d  1  7 e  1  6 f  1  5 g  1  4 h  1  3 i
.2  2 b  2  1 c  2 10 d  2  9 e  2  8 f  2  7 g  2  6 h  2 11 i  2  4 j
.3  3 c  3  2 d  3  1 e  3 11 f  3  9 g  3  8 h  3  7 i  3  6 j  3  5 a
.4  4 d  4  3 e  4  2 f  4  1 g  4 10 h  4  9 i  4  8 j  4  7 a  4 11 b
.5  5 e  5  4 f  5  3 g  5  2 h  5  1 i  5 10 j  5  9 a  5  8 b  5  7 c
11  7 f 11  8 g 11  9 h 11 10 i 11 11 j 11  3 a 11  4 b 11  5 c 11  6 d
.6  6 g  6  5 h  6  4 i  6  3 j  6  2 a  6  1 b  6 10 c  6  9 d  6  8 e
.7 11 h  7  6 i  7  5 j  7  4 a  7  3 b  7  2 c  7  1 d  7 10 e  7  9 f
.8  8 i  8  7 j  8  6 a  8  5 b  8  4 c  8 11 d  8  2 e  8  1 f  8 10 g
.9  9 j  9 11 a  9  7 b  9  6 c  9  5 d  9  4 e  9  3 f  9  2 g  9  1 h
10 10 a 10  9 b 10  8 c 10  7 d 10  6 e 10  5 f 10 11 g 10  3 h 10  2 i

Movement card for EW11 and card showing who NS11 expect at their table
EW
11           NS 11                          
       
Rnd     Tbl     Brds  Rnd       EW      Brds                    
       
1  7    22      24    1  7      16      18                      
       
2  9  1  3    2  8      19      21                      
       
3  1  7  9    3  9      22      24                      
       
4  3    16      18    4 10      25      27                      
       
5       11      28      30    5 11      28      30
       
6  8    10      12    6  3  1  3
       
7       10      19      21    7  4  4  6
       
8  2    25      27    8  5  7  9
       
9  4  4  6    9  6      10      12


Perhaps someone has a simpler solution - I can't think of one.

Nick
"Pass is your friend" - my brother in law - who likes to bid a lot.
0

#2 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2009-September-13, 15:37

If you have two sets of pre-duplicated boards you can play a Bowman without worrying where you position Table 11. If you have Bridgemates you don't have to worry about entering the scores into the travellers in the correct place.
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#3 User is offline   NickRW 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,951
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sussex, England

Posted 2009-September-13, 17:02

gordontd, on Sep 13 2009, 09:37 PM, said:

If you have two sets of pre-duplicated boards you can play a Bowman without worrying where you position Table 11. If you have Bridgemates you don't have to worry about entering the scores into the travellers in the correct place.

What I have is a club that has existed for some years, but less than 18 months ago was a subset of the local tennis club. To say that the tennis club milked the bridge club for all it was worth is an overstatement - but we had little funds when we went independent and still do not have the funds to invest in Bridgemates or dealing machines. On top of that I am not sure that the committee are all that receptive to the idea of dealing machines either. So, in short I cannot easily pre-duplicate boards without a lot of work and, since I don't know in advance how many tables I will have, often such work would be a waste anyway.

If I had access to a dealing machine, then I wouldn't have this hassle!

Nick
"Pass is your friend" - my brother in law - who likes to bid a lot.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users