[borag]

Ok just sharing ideas for brainstorming

1♣=9-14 unbal 4+♥ or 15+ bal/unbal 5+♥
1♦=9-14 unbal 4♠ or 15+ bal/unbal 5+♠
1♥=15+ bal no 5cM or 15+ unbal 4441, 5m-4x, 6+m, 5m-5m
1♠=9-14 bal/unbal 5+♠
1N= 11-14 bal 5♥ possible no 5♠, 5m4m(31) possible
2♣=9-14 unbal 5+♣-4♦ or 6+♣
2♦=9-14 unbal 5+♦-4+♣ or 6+♦
2M=5-8 unbal 5+M
2N=20-21 bal 5M possible

what do u think

[wclass___]

IMO it is step back...

I like that you can use judgement for 5♥332 hands.
Really doun't understand why it doesn't apply for ♠.

2♣/2♦ i like these openings, because i play them myself (I prefer other range)

2M -- I wouldn't use them as preempts. System is already very agressive.. i would take away some problem hands to improve 1 in suit openings.

1♣/1♦ -- i did play sth similar, but i doun't anymore. What are responses?

1♥ -- im sceptical

[csdenmark]

borag, on Jul 16 2009, 07:37 PM, said:

Ok just sharing ideas for brainstorming

1♣=9-14 unbal 4+♥ or 15+ bal/unbal 5+♥
1♦=9-14 unbal 4♠ or 15+ bal/unbal 5+♠
1♥=15+ bal no 5cM or 15+ unbal 4441, 5m-4x, 6+m, 5m-5m
1♠=9-14 bal/unbal 5+♠
1N= 11-14 bal 5♥ possible no 5♠, 5m4m(31) possible
2♣=9-14 unbal 5+♣-4♦ or 6+♣
2♦=9-14 unbal 5+♦-4+♣ or 6+♦
2M=5-8 unbal 5+M
2N=20-21 bal 5M possible

what do u think

If you really want to know then I think it looks like a boring system.

----------------------------------

As you are no american you ought to have enough energy to write 'you' and not 'u'

[borag]

hi wclass, yes sure u always have the chance to open 1N with spades.
and i will think about using 2M in a different way maybe 9-14 6+M from 1th/2nd seat to optimize rest.

thanks & regards